2004
DOI: 10.1256/qj.03.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux–gradient relationship, self‐correlation and intermittency in the stable boundary layer

Abstract: SUMMARYThe correlation between dimensionless shear φ m and dimensionless height z/L, where L is the Obukhov length, for stable conditions is strongly influenced by self-correlation for the present datasets. This effect is quite large for stronger stability but still significant for near-neutral conditions. A conditional analysis of nocturnal stable boundary-layer data, where 'non-turbulent' parts of the record are removed, reduces the impact of nonstationarity and therefore reduces the scatter. The conditional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
146
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that, although the analysis is not dominated by self-correlation, it is not insignificant at Høvsøre. The degree of self-correlation at Høvsøre is comparable to that estimated using data from the CASES-99 field experiment (Klipp and Mahrt 2004).…”
Section: Surface Layersupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This indicates that, although the analysis is not dominated by self-correlation, it is not insignificant at Høvsøre. The degree of self-correlation at Høvsøre is comparable to that estimated using data from the CASES-99 field experiment (Klipp and Mahrt 2004).…”
Section: Surface Layersupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The data scatter is large, rendering it impossible to determine γ and δ with a fair degree of accuracy. It should be noted that the dependences shown in Figures 1 and 2 may be subject to self-correlation (Klipp and Mahrt, 2004); f appears in the numerator of h|f |/u * and in the denominator of u * / C uN L|f | + N/|f |. An attempt to plot dimensional SBL depth h versus the composite stability parameter u * / C uN L|f | + N/|f | (not shown) does not reduce the data scatter.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Data affected by airflow distortion due to the anemometer booms at certain wind directions were also eliminated; the block-averaging interval for obtaining mean variables was 10 min. The wind velocity and temperature gradients were estimated using an approach described by Klipp and Mahrt (2004) and Sun (2011). The plots of the resulting similarity functions G t , G h , G w , G θ , for fluxes and variances, normalized by the gradient-based scales (13a, b) and (18a, b), are presented in Figs.…”
Section: Empirical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%