2010
DOI: 10.1002/qj.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the limiting effect of the Earth's rotation on the depth of a stably stratified boundary layer

Abstract: Simple dimensionality arguments are not sufficient to determine γ and δ. To do this would require an exact solution to equations governing the structure of mean fields and turbulence in the SBL. Since such a solution is not known, the exponents should be evaluated from experimental data. Available data from observations and from large-eddy simulations are uncertain. They do not make it possible to evaluate γ and δ to adequate accuracy and to decide conclusively between the alternative formulations for the SBL … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the normalization of height (y axis here) is carried out using the depth (turbulent length scale) of the neutral simulations. Other scales can be used for normalization (Mironov & Fedorovich (2010), for example, pointed to several depth scales for stable boundary layers that are consistent with TKE and momentum budgets), but, to emphasize the effect of static stability on turbulence at a given dimensional distance from the wall, we use the fixed neutral-case turbulent Ekman layer length scale for normalization. Figure 12 presents the vertical variation of 2q 2 = u i u i (twice the TKE) at various stabilities and at different Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Profiles Of the Gradient Richardson Number Tke And Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the normalization of height (y axis here) is carried out using the depth (turbulent length scale) of the neutral simulations. Other scales can be used for normalization (Mironov & Fedorovich (2010), for example, pointed to several depth scales for stable boundary layers that are consistent with TKE and momentum budgets), but, to emphasize the effect of static stability on turbulence at a given dimensional distance from the wall, we use the fixed neutral-case turbulent Ekman layer length scale for normalization. Figure 12 presents the vertical variation of 2q 2 = u i u i (twice the TKE) at various stabilities and at different Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Profiles Of the Gradient Richardson Number Tke And Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following, for instance, Mironov and Fedorovich (2010) we take the friction velocity, u * , the surface Obukhov length, L 0 , and the Coriolis force, f, as scales for the surface layer, and u * , f and the Brunt-Väisälä frequency, N, as scales for the turbulent flow above the surface layer, with N 'imposed' at height h representing the potential temperature gradient at this height and for some distance above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or, equally, Mironov and Fedorovich (2010) give an equation for this functional form. The two sets of scales lead to classifying a stable boundary layer in terms of surfaceflux conditions and 'imposed' or 'external' conditions, and to sub-classifications of surface-flux dominated and external-stability dominated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular case of such flows is stratified Ekman flow where static stability acts on top of the stabilizing effect of rotation (Mironov & Fedorovich 2010). Turbulent Ekman flow is the limit of the planetary boundary layer over a homogeneous smooth surface with a constant geostrophic forcing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%