Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting
DOI: 10.1109/ias.1991.178199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux-current methods for SRM rotor position estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A commonly applied active phase approach is the fluxlinkage method [114]. It does not require additional hardware and estimates the rotor position from the measured phase current and applied flux linkage.…”
Section: Self-sensing Of Srmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly applied active phase approach is the fluxlinkage method [114]. It does not require additional hardware and estimates the rotor position from the measured phase current and applied flux linkage.…”
Section: Self-sensing Of Srmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the conventional flux estimation-based sensorless control algorithm [11,12], combined with the current-gradient method [13] as a fault-tolerant backup at high speed, was implemented. Fig.…”
Section: Sensorless Position Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of research works on Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) of stator winding, power electronics and bearing of SRM [9][10][11][12][13] but very few publications concerning the FDD of position sensor [14]. Although it is a trend that the position sensor will be eliminated with the mature of sensor-less control technology [15][16][17][18][19], most SRGs still have position sensors in a considerable period of time. When the position sensor fails, the system should be able to detect it in the very begining and then switch to the backup sensor or execute proper system reconfiguration and fault tolerant control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%