2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2011.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial styles, palaeohydrology and modern analogues of an exhumed, Cretaceous fluvial system: Cerro Barcino Formation, Cañadón Asfalto Basin, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the uniform feature width across preservation states (negative to positive relief) is instructive in assessing former flow geometry. Importantly, careful consideration of the fluvial system (e.g., lateral channel migration) and preservation (e.g., erosion resulting in underestimate) must be contemplated before adopting the landform width as the flow conduit width (Cardenas & Mohrig, ; Foix et al, ; Hayden et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the uniform feature width across preservation states (negative to positive relief) is instructive in assessing former flow geometry. Importantly, careful consideration of the fluvial system (e.g., lateral channel migration) and preservation (e.g., erosion resulting in underestimate) must be contemplated before adopting the landform width as the flow conduit width (Cardenas & Mohrig, ; Foix et al, ; Hayden et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martian “inverted channels” resemble terrestrial fossilized paleofluvial channels (Foix et al, ; Maizels ; Martinez et al, ; Pain & Ollier, ; Williams et al, ), and are identified by their sinuous and/or branching planimetric pattern, continuity relationships with valley networks, and geologic context (e.g., distributary channels on alluvial fans). FSRs on Mars range in scale from large‐scale landforms identified in Viking images (10–200 km long, 0.3 to 3 km wide; Howard, ; Kargel & Strom, ) to fine‐scale bifurcating ridges (few hundred meters long, few tens of meters wide; Burr et al, , ; Davis et al, ; Williams & Edgett, ; Williams et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basin, Argentina (Foix et al, 2012). As a result, determining the internal structure of point bars has been attempted on modern systems where imaging can be attempted using seismic or ground penetrating radar (Bridge et al, 1995) but this, in turn, is typically constrained to thinner point bars that can be imaged in their entirety.…”
Section: Mega-point Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that in order to understand the life cycle of an entire point bar it is necessary to core and image the interior to determine how the river flow evolution has affected sediment type and grain‐size characteristics. This is typically hard to do because few ancient examples provide exposure in depth and planform and those that do are mostly much smaller scale systems, for example, the Scalby Formation in the UK (Ghinassi & Ielpi, ), the Ferron Sandstone of Utah (Wang & Bhattacharya, ), the Caspe Formation of the Ebro Basin, Spain (Cuevas Martinez et al ., ) and the Cerro Bacino Formation of the Canadon Asfalto Basin, Argentina (Foix et al ., ). As a result, determining the internal structure of point bars has been attempted on modern systems where imaging can be attempted using seismic or ground penetrating radar (Bridge et al ., ) but this, in turn, is typically constrained to thinner point bars that can be imaged in their entirety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, although ancient outcrop successions reveal vertical and lateral relationships between accumulated lithofacies, these successions cannot usually be directly related to the original planform morphologies of the preserved point-bar elements in which they are contained. A small number of exceptional outcrops expose both vertical and horizontal sections (e.g., Edwards et al, 1983;Foix et al, 2012;Smith, 1987), but even these are fragmentary 'windows' that reveal only a minor part of large and complex 3D geological bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%