Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.12.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorometric detection of cancer marker FEN1 based on double-flapped dumbbell DNA nanoprobe functionalized with silver nanoclusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with organic dyes and quantum dots (QDs), DNA/AgNCs have the superiority such as longer fluorescence lifetime, higher quantum yield and easy synthesis, low cost, and low toxicity [13,14]. In addition, the formation of AgNCs on the nucleation domain has no significant influence on the other parts of a DNA molecule and the remaining DNA domains still can fold and hybridize [15]. Considering this advantage, DNA/AgNCs can be combined with a variety of different amplification methods to achieve sensitive detection of nucleic acid without labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with organic dyes and quantum dots (QDs), DNA/AgNCs have the superiority such as longer fluorescence lifetime, higher quantum yield and easy synthesis, low cost, and low toxicity [13,14]. In addition, the formation of AgNCs on the nucleation domain has no significant influence on the other parts of a DNA molecule and the remaining DNA domains still can fold and hybridize [15]. Considering this advantage, DNA/AgNCs can be combined with a variety of different amplification methods to achieve sensitive detection of nucleic acid without labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] CRISPR-driven biosensors can achieve high-throughput and field-deployable detection of both nucleic acid [12][13][14] and non-nucleic-acid biomarkers, [15][16][17][18][19] serving as promising tools in food safety, 20,21 environmental monitoring, and medical diagnostics. [22][23][24][25] Currently, innovations of CRISPR-driven biosensors mainly focus on upstream signal processing, while focusing less on the reporting elements. [26][27][28] Most of the previous literature adopts a conventional reporter that a nucleic acid labeled with a pair of fluorophore and quencher (typically referred to as FQ-reporter), which takes a large proportion of the cost of the CRISPR-driven biosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9–11 CRISPR-driven biosensors can achieve high-throughput and field-deployable detection of both nucleic acid 12–14 and non-nucleic-acid biomarkers, 15–19 serving as promising tools in food safety, 20,21 environmental monitoring, and medical diagnostics. 22–25…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional assays, including western blot, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 1 , 3 , 4 ] had already been utilized to detect FEN1. Several novel strategies were also designed for FEN1 detection [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. For instance, Zhang et al [ 9 ] proposed a DNA-based fluorescent biosensor to evaluate FEN1 activity in living cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%