1987
DOI: 10.1063/1.97811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorine in low-pressure chemical vapor deposited W/Si contact structures: Inclusion and thermal stability

Abstract: Stability of the dimer structure formed on Si(100) by ultraclean lowpressure chemicalvapor deposition Recrystallization by rapid thermal annealing of implanted lowpressure chemicalvapordeposited amorphous Si films J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4878 (1987); 10.1063/1.338994Observations on the phase transformation and its effect on the resistivity of WSi2 films prepared by lowpressure chemical vapor deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first step, the bin centre correction and the radiative corrections are determined independently: the former by a parametrisation obtained in two different ways (see below); the latter by a standard fit (we use the LO GRV pdf's [21]). Then, we perform a LO QCD fit to the corrected CDHSW cross sections, to the CDHS data and to the BCDMS, NMC and SLAC [41] structure functions 4 . Using the pdf's of this fit we re-evaluate the full correction factor of eq.…”
Section: Cdhswmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first step, the bin centre correction and the radiative corrections are determined independently: the former by a parametrisation obtained in two different ways (see below); the latter by a standard fit (we use the LO GRV pdf's [21]). Then, we perform a LO QCD fit to the corrected CDHSW cross sections, to the CDHS data and to the BCDMS, NMC and SLAC [41] structure functions 4 . Using the pdf's of this fit we re-evaluate the full correction factor of eq.…”
Section: Cdhswmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target mass corrections [72] are also very small but have been taken into account in our calculations. Due to the W 2 and Q 2 cuts neither the E665 [73], nor the H1 (1995) [74], nor the SLAC [41], nor the ZEUS (1995) F 2 data [75] enter our fits.…”
Section: Heavy Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis of Ref. [3] we used combined SLAC-BCDMS-NMC proton-deuterium data [7] with the cuts x ≥ 0.3 to reduce QCD evolution to the nonsinglet case and x ≤ 0.75 to reject the region where a nuclear effects in deuterium can be significant. The initial scale of evolution was chosen equal to Q 2 0 = 9 GeV 2 to provide comparability with the earlier results of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the non-singlet case, we can combine eqs. (12,15) and the evolution of the gluon into a 'one-step' evolution of the singlet structure function [7] correct to O(α 2 S ) which is of the form…”
Section: Quark Singlet and Gluon Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the usual analysis of DIS structure functions, the parton distribution functions (pdf's) are parametrised at some starting scale, Q 2 0 , but now evolved according to eqs. (7,15,19). In the recent MRST fits [9], the starting scale is Q 2 0 = 1 GeV 2 and the gluon at small x is suppressed (so-called 'valence-like' gluon) at this Q 2 in order to describe the relatively small slope dF 2 /d ln Q 2 of the structure function observed at HERA [10,11] at low x and low Q 2 .…”
Section: Fitting the Dis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%