2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01136.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience

Abstract: Fluorescein angiography is a relative safe procedure and comparable to other intravenous radiocontrast media angiography or investigation. The present results are consistent with previous studies. Prophylactic treatment, fluorescein desensitization or oral fluorescein angiography should be considered in high-risk patients. Safe guards should be in place to manage potential serious adverse reactions. Other imaging techniques, like optical coherence tomography, should be considered as an alternative in selected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Serious adverse reactions are extremely rare but are known to occur. 7 Yannuzzi et al 8 estimated the risk of death following FFA to be 1:222 000. Minor adverse reactions are not uncommon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serious adverse reactions are extremely rare but are known to occur. 7 Yannuzzi et al 8 estimated the risk of death following FFA to be 1:222 000. Minor adverse reactions are not uncommon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nausea rates of 0.7% (3) , 2.9% (4) and 6.83% were found (1) . In another study the subgroup of diabetic patients experienced the highest nausea rate in more than 15% of the angiograms (5) , but hypertensive and elderly patients did not show increase in such reactions (6) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the available published literature, anaphylactic shock in response to intravenous fluorescein administration during eye fundus angiography is an extremely rare complication (1 out of 22,000 patients). Allergy established in the anamnesis of several patients and need in a diagnostic trial implied prescription of desensitizing therapy [6,7]. According to other data, allergic reactions resulting in cardiopulmonary failure have never been registered at confocal laser endomicroscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%