2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2020.105633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorene based amorphous hole transporting materials for solution processed organic light-emitting diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11–14 However, the devices are fabricated using a thermal evaporation process which makes the process overall quite expensive with numerous disadvantages such as high-power consumption, restrictions in scalability, decreased throughput, high rate of material consumption, complex color patterning process and non-uniform film deposition for large area fabrication while maintaining an enhanced resolution in pixels. 15–17 This also delays the further commercialization and adoption of the OLED technology due to the high costs involved. The adoption of solution-processable fabrication processes can mitigate this problem by providing an inexpensive pathway for the fabrication of large-area efficient devices with a much higher utilization rate of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11–14 However, the devices are fabricated using a thermal evaporation process which makes the process overall quite expensive with numerous disadvantages such as high-power consumption, restrictions in scalability, decreased throughput, high rate of material consumption, complex color patterning process and non-uniform film deposition for large area fabrication while maintaining an enhanced resolution in pixels. 15–17 This also delays the further commercialization and adoption of the OLED technology due to the high costs involved. The adoption of solution-processable fabrication processes can mitigate this problem by providing an inexpensive pathway for the fabrication of large-area efficient devices with a much higher utilization rate of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents the exciton energy transfer from the host to the hole-transporting layer and maintains the position of the recombination zone. 70 Also, pyrene–pyridine-based hole-transporting materials demonstrate a better electron blocking layer as compared to NPB. The relatively higher triplet energy of Py-Br (2.62 eV) than that of the host material (CBP) possibly helps in confining the triplet excitons within the emission layer most effectively as compared to NPB-based devices, resulting in improved device performance of Py-Br ( Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recorded E T of compounds 1.1 and 1.2 are 2.38 and 2.28 eV, respectively. The better OLED performance of 1.1 is consistent with the small energy transfer barrier (0.17 eV) with CBP (2.55 eV) that ensures efficient harvesting of excitons with favorable charge balance and energy transfer in the devices …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%