2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidic flow delay by ionogel passive pumps in microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these techniques have a limited range of fluid control [6,31,34]. While there are many additional methods of passive fluid control in microPADs (e.g., fluidic diodes, delay shunts, altering pore size, ionogel passive pumps, laser direct writing, sucrose delays, chemical modifications, dissolvable/erodible bridges) [6,11,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], all of these have significant limitations, such as the extensive use of additional fabrication materials or equipment beyond what is required for wax printing (e.g., laser cutters, plastic sheets, or adhesives) [39,40,44,45], use of reagents that could impact downstream assays (e.g., sugars, polymers, or surfactants) [11,38,42,43,46], or the use of techniques not compatible with high-volume fabrication [36,37,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques have a limited range of fluid control [6,31,34]. While there are many additional methods of passive fluid control in microPADs (e.g., fluidic diodes, delay shunts, altering pore size, ionogel passive pumps, laser direct writing, sucrose delays, chemical modifications, dissolvable/erodible bridges) [6,11,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], all of these have significant limitations, such as the extensive use of additional fabrication materials or equipment beyond what is required for wax printing (e.g., laser cutters, plastic sheets, or adhesives) [39,40,44,45], use of reagents that could impact downstream assays (e.g., sugars, polymers, or surfactants) [11,38,42,43,46], or the use of techniques not compatible with high-volume fabrication [36,37,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOs are porous materials that swell in an aqueous environment. Upon absorbing large amounts of water, they change their volume abruptly which induces severe conformational changes in the microstructure, thus affecting their ion mobility . Therefore, our designed AZO‐IDEs have been used to monitor such changes by EIS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparation of the Ionogel Solutions : The synthesis of the IOs was performed following the protocol described in reference . In brief a mixture of N ‐isopropylacrylamide (0.904 g), N,Nʹ ‐methylene‐bis(acrylamide) (0.025 g), 2,2‐dimethoxy‐2‐phenylacetophenone (0.021 g), and (2 mL) 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate (IO‐1) or trihexyltetradecyl‐phosphonium dicyanamide (IO‐2) ionic liquid was placed in a flask and heated at 80 °C during 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for fluid control and transport in the devices. The increase of the cost of the devices resulted in the decrease of the market possibilities 35 . Therefore, "Lab on a paper" is being developed to provide an answer to deliver simple, cheap and autonomous devices which are easily manageable by the end-users 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper is receiving a huge amount of attraction as a promising substrate material for microfluidic devices not only due to its extremely low cost and ubiquity but also due to its mechanical properties comprising flexibility, lightness, and low thickness 36 . In particular, µPADs is a relatively new group of analytical tools, capable of analysing complex biochemical samples, within one analytical run, where fluidic manipulations like transportation, sorting, mixing or separation are available 35, 38 . Thanks to the capillary forces of paper, there is no requirement for external pumps to provide fluid transport inside the paper unlike traditional microfluidic platforms 35 . However this advantage also generates a drawback; isotropic wicking behaviour of paper and the fluid transportation by any exposed surface area prevents the accurate control of the fluid transport on paper material, making it highly challenging and complicated 39,40 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%