2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid–structure interaction modeling of complex parachute designs with the space–time finite element techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first kind of these methods is good at providing accurate incompressible aerodynamic simulations, such as developing the semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations (SIM-PLE algorithm), 1,2 applying the immersed boundary method 3,4 or the front tracking method. 5 The second kind uses a real parachute configuration and the finite element method to simulate both the structure and fluid dynamic behavior, including the space-time fluid structure interaction (FSI)technique [6][7][8][9][10][11] and commercial software LS-DYNA, [12][13][14] which uses the Eulerian-Langrangian penalty coupling algorithm and the multimaterial Eulerian formulation based fluid solver to simulate parachute problems. Restricted by the complex configuration of a real parachute system, the first kind of methods usually uses a semi-experimental 15,16 hypothesis to establish a parachute canopy model or upgrade the mass-spring damper (MSD) model to treat the parachute canopy as a virtual spring net system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first kind of these methods is good at providing accurate incompressible aerodynamic simulations, such as developing the semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations (SIM-PLE algorithm), 1,2 applying the immersed boundary method 3,4 or the front tracking method. 5 The second kind uses a real parachute configuration and the finite element method to simulate both the structure and fluid dynamic behavior, including the space-time fluid structure interaction (FSI)technique [6][7][8][9][10][11] and commercial software LS-DYNA, [12][13][14] which uses the Eulerian-Langrangian penalty coupling algorithm and the multimaterial Eulerian formulation based fluid solver to simulate parachute problems. Restricted by the complex configuration of a real parachute system, the first kind of methods usually uses a semi-experimental 15,16 hypothesis to establish a parachute canopy model or upgrade the mass-spring damper (MSD) model to treat the parachute canopy as a virtual spring net system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transonic flow past a sphere was also reported in 2006 [52]. The FSI computations reported in 2007 [5,[53][54][55][56][57] and 2008 [58][59][60][61][62][63] were for flow past a flag, patient-specific models of a middle cerebral artery with aneurysm and a birfucating middle cerebral artery with aneurysm, carotid artery birfucation, abdominal aortic aneurysms, parachutes with complex designs, a cloth piece falling over a rigid rod, flow in a tube constrained with a diaphragm, inflation of a balloon, flow through and around a windsock, descent of a T-10 parachute with fabric porosity, sails, Orion spacecraft parachutes, flow around two flexible spheres colliding, and a flexible sphere sliding past a constriction in a channel.…”
Section: Years 2001-2010mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There exist several approaches to perform this analysis, starting from the simplest one, where the nozzle is characterized only by the mass, the inertia and a torsional spring at the throat, to more complex FSI models [34] as the one studied in this work.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Frequency Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%