2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119457008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid Mechanics in Channel, Pipe and Aerodynamic Design Geometries 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used model analysis to determine the correlation between the tubular flow rate and microchannel flow rate, followed by recording the pressure range at the selected sites inside the channel. As expected from network piping physics calculations [44], the flow rate in the tube system was proportional to the flow rate in the microfluidic channel, because the total flow rate was equal to the summation of flow rates in the individual branches. Although the results exhibited that the tube flow rate was linearly proportional to the total pressure at the selected locations, in reality, the linear interpolation between velocity and pressure was set in the simulation for obtaining approximate results with less complex computational process and time.…”
Section: Simulation and Modulationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In this study, we used model analysis to determine the correlation between the tubular flow rate and microchannel flow rate, followed by recording the pressure range at the selected sites inside the channel. As expected from network piping physics calculations [44], the flow rate in the tube system was proportional to the flow rate in the microfluidic channel, because the total flow rate was equal to the summation of flow rates in the individual branches. Although the results exhibited that the tube flow rate was linearly proportional to the total pressure at the selected locations, in reality, the linear interpolation between velocity and pressure was set in the simulation for obtaining approximate results with less complex computational process and time.…”
Section: Simulation and Modulationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Based on (4), the possible extracted power will vary for the same WT, depends on the air density. According to Georgantopoulou and Georgantopoulos (2018), the pressure p and standard temperature T are known for a given altitude. With R as the real gas constant, the standard air density can be calculated from the ideal gas law, expressed as…”
Section: Proposed Wra Approach Considering Moist Air Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water vapor pressure p w , ambient pressure p , and temperature T for a given altitude h alt , standard temperature T 0 , and standard pressure p 0 (Engineering Toolbox, 2004b; Georgantopoulou and Georgantopoulos, 2018) are defined by (10)–(12), respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Wra Approach Considering Moist Air Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid methodology is developed using only Cartesiangrid lines, which is quite acceptable for such geometries providing robust results [10]. This method is based on Tseng approach [11], while it has been already applied successfully for pipe flows prediction in our recent research work [12]. A refinement technique is required to be developed, as grid clustering is required only to specific areas with flow interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%