2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl022256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid flow and seismicity pattern: Evidence from the 1997 Umbria‐Marche (central Italy) seismic sequence

Abstract: [1] We model the spatial and temporal evolution of seismicity during the 1997 Umbria-Marche seismic sequence in terms of subsequent failures promoted by fluid flow. The diffusion process of pore-pressure relaxation is represented as a pressure perturbation generated by coseismic stress changes and propagating through a fluid saturated medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
94
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On 5 April, a few hours before the occurrence of the 01:32 main shock, seismicity went back to activate the L'Aquila plane. In extensional environments, seismicity migration episodes along preferred directions during both foreshock and aftershock sequences are often related to diffusion processes [Noir et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2004;Antonioli et al, 2005]. It is worth noting that the occurrence of the largest foreshock, about a week before the main shock, signed a sharp variation in the V P /V S ratio modeled by Lucente et al [2010] in terms of a dilatancy diffusion process suggesting a key role for fluids in the nucleation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On 5 April, a few hours before the occurrence of the 01:32 main shock, seismicity went back to activate the L'Aquila plane. In extensional environments, seismicity migration episodes along preferred directions during both foreshock and aftershock sequences are often related to diffusion processes [Noir et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2004;Antonioli et al, 2005]. It is worth noting that the occurrence of the largest foreshock, about a week before the main shock, signed a sharp variation in the V P /V S ratio modeled by Lucente et al [2010] in terms of a dilatancy diffusion process suggesting a key role for fluids in the nucleation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many seismological aspects, e.g. Antonioli et al (2005), the seismic area of Umbria-Marche (central Italy) and surroundings is of particular interest. For this area, the catalog in the period 1981-1996 at latitudes 41.5-44.5 N and the sequence in the period 1997-1998 were analyzed (sets UM).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These could be induced by some mechanism triggering the seismicity (Godano and Pingue, 2005;Tosi, 2004). For the UM sequence this can be identified in the pore-fluid flow (see Antonioli et al, 2005 and references therein). The properties of the catalogues data sets seem to be very similar among them with a slight but significant deviation for California.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fluid-injection induced earthquakes (e.g. Shapiro et al 1997;Rothert and Shapiro 2003;Shapiro et al 2003;Antonioli et al 2005), reservoir induced (e.g. Ferreira et al 1995); intraplate earthquake swarms (e.g.…”
Section: Pore Presssue Perturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, if the earthquake triggering occurs shortly after the pore pressure perturbations (Noir et al 1997), we should observe a narrow cluster of seismicity along the line of the modelled parabola in the r-t plot with variable scalar D values. The D-value in the earth's crust usually ranges between 0.1 and 10 m 2 /s (Shapiro et al 1999) but can reach to 90 m 2 /s (Antonioli et al 2005) but there is no upper limit. In this scheme the r-t plot basically represents spatial distance ''r'' of an individual event from the injection point as a function of time ''t''.…”
Section: Pore Presssue Perturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%