Fluffy PR and ‘comms girls’: banter, social interactions and the office culture in public relations in England

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to explore social interactions, banter and the office culture in the public relations (PR) industry in England with the use of the difference approach and Bourdieu’s habitus theory. The paper explores whether PR organisations act as masculine habitus. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 women practitioners, and thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Women were asked questions on social interactions, banter and the office culture, as well as questions on exclusion, from business decisions and having to work harder to succeed. Findings Findings show that two main themes dominate in responses from interviewees, “de-patriarchalisation” of PR with no personal appearance requirements and no business exclusions because of gender, and “gendered organisations” where interviewees reported dismissive stereotypes of women who work in PR, networking as a job requirement and differences between male-dominated and female-dominated offices, which includes differences between social interactions and banter among men and women. Practical implications Results indicate that women feel there are differences in social interactions and banter between men and women. Interviewees also report masculine domination as and harmful stereotypes of public PR professionals, most of whom are women. Organisations who have PR departments, as well as those who hire PR agencies to do the work externally, should design policies on the office culture to ensure equality and respectful work environment for everyone. Social implications In line with the difference approach, women report differences in social interactions and banter between them and men, thus signalling that social differences influence the office culture and work interactions, which tend to be gendered. Findings also indicate that organisations are functioning as a masculine world where women struggle to fit in and obtain recognition. Consciousness-raising is needed in the industry because many women do not recognise oppression in the form of social interactions, and its effect on the position of women or the fact that the most feminized industry is being trivialised by the men on top. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first paper analysing interactions in PR offices using the difference approach and Bourdieu’s habitus theory.

Gender-biased office culture in Croatian PR industry: why feminine sectors practice masculine patterns?

“…In addition to the office interactions and banter, de-patriarchalisation of PR is evident regarding the dress code, which echoes similar findings from a recent study conducted in England (Topić, 2020, 2021). A few interviewees stated that there is a “prescribed code of conduct which includes the dress code – business style of dressing” (interviewee 1), “yes, we have dress code, it's called smart casual.…”

“…Moreover, all interviewees agreed that networking is extremely important for two reasons – career advancement and job requirement in the PR industry which is similar to the findings in England where women as well reported that networking is a job requirement (Topić, 2020, 2021). This view is echoed by interviewees from this study,Every time we organise or go to the events we have to network, mingle and share our visit cards in order to acquire new clients.…”

Board gender diversity and women in leadership positions – are quotas the solution?

“…The communications/PR literature points to several reasons holding women back from the promotion (breaking through the glass ceiling) to senior leadership positions within the PR industry (See, for example, Fielden et al. , 2003; Place and Vardeman-Winter, 2018; Polić and Holy, 2021; Topić, 2021; Topić, 2020; Topić et al. , 2019; Yeomans, 2019).…”

Female leadership in communication management in Spain: making a difference in a sexist culture

“…Theoretical and empirical research have faithfully reflected the growth of women working in communication management and public relations (Aldoory and Toth, 2002; Dubrowski et al. , 2019; Topić, 2021a). However, the third wave of feminism highlighted the unfavourable position of women concerning men due to patriarchy and gender-related social, political and economic inequalities in organisations and society (Pompper, 2007).…”