2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.j056111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Separation Control over a NACA 0015 Airfoil Using Nanosecond-Pulsed Plasma Actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present work reports hydrodynamic force measurements and flow visualizations with particle image velocimetry (PIV) around a circular arc plate in nominally 2D flow to relate the forces to the associated flow patterns. Indeed, as highlighted, for example, in [21], the joint analysis of forces and flowfield proves very helpful to get a better insight into the physics of the flow and may be useful in the perspective of flow control [22]. The tested section, the experimental setup, and data processing are presented in Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work reports hydrodynamic force measurements and flow visualizations with particle image velocimetry (PIV) around a circular arc plate in nominally 2D flow to relate the forces to the associated flow patterns. Indeed, as highlighted, for example, in [21], the joint analysis of forces and flowfield proves very helpful to get a better insight into the physics of the flow and may be useful in the perspective of flow control [22]. The tested section, the experimental setup, and data processing are presented in Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57). In this case, at positive angles of attack, the stagnation point of the flow shifts to the lower surface of the airfoil and turns out to be further upstream than the zone of maximum discharge energy deposition, which is located near the leading edge of In contrast to [213,231], in [232,233] the actuator was used in the standard geometry: the exposed electrode was located upstream and the encapsulated electrode was located downstream. The trailing edge of the exposed electrode, from which the discharge started, was not on the airfoil axis, but shifted from the leading edge by 0.5% of the chord.…”
Section: Effect Of Actuator Position On Efficiency Of Flow Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trailing edge of the exposed electrode, from which the discharge started, was not on the airfoil axis, but shifted from the leading edge by 0.5% of the chord. Since, in [232,233], the NACA-0015 airfoil was also used at practically the same Reynolds numbers (Re = 3.06 × 10 5 for [231] and Re = 2.68 × 10 5 for [233]), it becomes possible to directly compare the efficiency of these two geometries of ns-SDBD actuators. Shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Actuator Position On Efficiency Of Flow Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potocar et al [17] investigated the flow around a NACA4421 turbine blade at Re number of 7,600 and 10,500. Zheng et al [21] placed a symmetrical plasma actuators on SC(2)-0714 supercritical airfoil model to show the effect of the plasma actuators for controlling the turbulent boundary layer separation at high Re numbers. They reported that input energy influences the plasma actuator effectiveness in flow control around the turbine blade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that input energy influences the plasma actuator effectiveness in flow control around the turbine blade. [23] Zheng et al [21] reported that increase in actuation frequency is suppressed the flow separation and delayed it downstream. In a numerical study of Khoshkoo and Jahangirian, [19] the effect of the unsteady plasma body force is compared with that of steady force over a stalled NACA0015 airfoil at Re = 4.5 × 10 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%