2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow pattern and agglomeration in the dust outlet of a gas cyclone investigated by Phase Doppler Anemometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obermair et al17 directly measured the effects of solids on (swirl) velocity profiles in the lower parts of a cyclone separator. We have simulated their experimental configuration in order to further validate our numerical procedure, specifically the representation of the effects the particles have on the gas‐flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Obermair et al17 directly measured the effects of solids on (swirl) velocity profiles in the lower parts of a cyclone separator. We have simulated their experimental configuration in order to further validate our numerical procedure, specifically the representation of the effects the particles have on the gas‐flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with a brief recapitulation of the essentials of the numerical procedure, and of the modeling assumptions we make. We then discuss the cases studied experimentally by Obermair et al17, 18 that we use for validation purposes. In the main part of the article we introduce and then describe the results of the Stairmand cyclone simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 10(d) shows the time-averaged tangential velocity profiles in the ejector, which shows almost linear variation in the radial direction and is nearly symmetric about the centreline. As noted by Strasser (2010) and Obermair et al (2005), the flow in this region has a solid-body vortex characteristic similar to the one at the core of the cyclone body. The axial velocity predicted by the k-ω-υ 2 model is slightly higher than DRSM model predictions at the cyclone core, while the radial velocity maximum predicted by DRSM is slighter higher than the k-ω-υ 2 model results.…”
Section: Results From Gc2mentioning
confidence: 56%