1994
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-induced Oscillations Of A Circular Cylinder Due To Interference Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the cases considered, the interfering cylinder was never upstream of the test cylinder. In an attempt to bring out the influence of geometry, in some of the cases, the results are compared with those of circular geometry (Sreedharan, 1992;Gowda and Sreedharan, 1994). The response of the test cylinder was obtained for different ratios of interfering cylinder side dimension b to the test cylinder side dimension B: i.e., b=B ¼ 0:5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the cases considered, the interfering cylinder was never upstream of the test cylinder. In an attempt to bring out the influence of geometry, in some of the cases, the results are compared with those of circular geometry (Sreedharan, 1992;Gowda and Sreedharan, 1994). The response of the test cylinder was obtained for different ratios of interfering cylinder side dimension b to the test cylinder side dimension B: i.e., b=B ¼ 0:5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature confirms this possibility. At a free stream turbulence intensity of less than 1% and at low damping conditions, Gowda and Sreedharan [43] report a peak-topeak amplitude value equal to 13% of the diameter of the cylinder at a reduced velocity value of 5.3 (present case value for circular cylinder). It is interesting that under closely similar conditions, a square cylinder was found to exhibit a higher peak-to-peak amplitude value equal to 16% of the cylinder side dimension [44].…”
Section: Mode and Mechanism Of Shedding At R/b=05mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The arrangement is essentially the same as that used by Gowda and Sreedharan [17]. The experimental model features are the same as those described in G&A.…”
Section: Experimental Set Upmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is found to be somewhat similar to the response characteristics reported at position A1 [11] wherein amplitude once triggered is not returning to lower levels as the reduced velocity is increased (for b/B>1.0). The response observed at A13 for b/B 1.0 is typically of vortex-induced vibration (self-limiting characteristic) and for b/B>1.0, quite possibly, the excitation mechanism is due to 'proximity-induced galloping' (Bokain and Geoola [19]; Gowda and Sreedharan [17]). To highlight further, composed with the response of the single cylinder case, considerable interference effects could be observed for the cases with b/B>1.0 wherein they do not exhibit a finite resonance range, unlike the cases with b/B 1.0.…”
Section: Interference Effects; Influence Of B/b Ratio (Vibratory Resumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation