The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2015.1099569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow field analysis of a pentagonal-shaped bridge deck by unsteady RANS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wind tunnel tests can apparently be guided or even be replaced by numerical modelling. A series of successful numerical section studies have been performed with detailed validation to measurements [8][9][10][11]. A full review of these is found in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind tunnel tests can apparently be guided or even be replaced by numerical modelling. A series of successful numerical section studies have been performed with detailed validation to measurements [8][9][10][11]. A full review of these is found in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the travel time under UE state in the pre-maintenance period, the maintenance activities add up to 22,610 h of traffic delays. In the bridge maintenance practice, two empirical strategies, i.e., flow-first scheduling strategy (FFSS) [38] and worst-first scheduling strategy (WFSS) [39] are two commonly adopted strategies. FFSS determines the time sequence of bridge maintenance activities by traffic flow from highest to lowest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better satisfy the requirement of the mesh size of the numerical method, a 1/10-scale model was used in the computation. The unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equation is used in most numerical studies involving these conditions to describe the time-averaged flow; the results obtained by this equation are also valid for determining the pressure field, velocity field, and aerodynamic forces (Haque et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2018). According to a previous study conducted by Morden et al (2015), the shear stress transport (SST) k − ω approach can reduce the computational expense with a slight reduction in accuracy when predicting forces and surface pressures.…”
Section: The Computation Methods and The Computational Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%