2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2011.00374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric assessment of canine erythrocytes and platelets for dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1

Abstract: Flow cytometry was a reliable method for detection of DEA 1.1 on canine erythrocytes. The absence of DEA 1.1 on platelets from DEA 1.1-positive dogs suggests that their platelets do not express DEA 1.1 and will not induce production of anti-DEA 1.1 antibodies that might lead to platelet refractoriness or reactions to a subsequent transfusion of DEA 1.1-positive erythrocytes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a,5, [14][15][16] Recently, flow cytometry with the anti-DEA 1.X polyclonal antibody was used experimentally to type erythrocytes for DEA 1.1, but DEA 1.1 and 1.2 expression levels or their variation among dogs were not examined. 17 Originally, DEA 1.1 typing was done with a polyclonal DEA 1.1 antiserum derived by alloimmunizing dogs with different blood types; this reagent was a weak agglutinin and required canine antiglobulin (Coombs') reagent to better visualize the agglutination reaction in the tube or microtiter assay. 5,6,10,13 Two murine monoclonal anti-DEA 1.1 antibodies, introduced in the 1990s, are used in typing cards, b gel columns, c and immunochromatographic strips.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a,5, [14][15][16] Recently, flow cytometry with the anti-DEA 1.X polyclonal antibody was used experimentally to type erythrocytes for DEA 1.1, but DEA 1.1 and 1.2 expression levels or their variation among dogs were not examined. 17 Originally, DEA 1.1 typing was done with a polyclonal DEA 1.1 antiserum derived by alloimmunizing dogs with different blood types; this reagent was a weak agglutinin and required canine antiglobulin (Coombs') reagent to better visualize the agglutination reaction in the tube or microtiter assay. 5,6,10,13 Two murine monoclonal anti-DEA 1.1 antibodies, introduced in the 1990s, are used in typing cards, b gel columns, c and immunochromatographic strips.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,10,13 Two murine monoclonal anti-DEA 1.1 antibodies, introduced in the 1990s, are used in typing cards, b gel columns, c and immunochromatographic strips. d, 13,[17][18][19][20][21] It has been suspected that DEA 1.2+ blood gives a weakly positive DEA 1.1 result. 13 Because these monoclonal antibodies were never properly evaluated against dogs which tested DEA 1.1+ or DEA 1.2+, we will refer to them as anti-DEA 1 rather than anti-DEA 1.1 antibodies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dog studies by Slichter et al, 15 donors and recipients expressed the dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1 (Oral communication, Dr. Sherrill Slichter, January 2019). But this model has limits since dog platelets do not express dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1 . Finally, it must be noted that healthy, animal facility–housed, sterile chow–fed, experimental animals likely have a different immune response compared to patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment for hematologic cancers …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this model has limits since dog platelets do not express dog erythrocyte antigen 1.1. 20 Finally, it must be noted that healthy, animal facility-housed, sterile chow-fed, experimental animals likely have a different immune response compared to patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment for hematologic cancers. [21][22][23] Fortunately, we may receive more data soon to help us find answers: The recently published EFFIPAP trial 24 collected data on HLA alloimmunization, and these are currently undergoing analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has also been used in veterinary hematology to detect DEA 1 from antibodies using this methodology. Lucidi et al (2011) researched DEA 1 in platelets but did not identify it while Polak et al (2015) used the technique to research DEA 1 in erythrocytes using this methodology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%