Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership 2003
DOI: 10.4135/9781452229539.n10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow, Creativity, and Shared Leadership: Rethinking the Motivation and Structuring of Knowledge Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of studies have supported the idea that sharing leadership among organizational members can have a powerful effect on the collective performance of individual employees within interdependent contexts (Avolio, Jung, Murry, & Sivasubramaniam, 1996;D'Innocenzo, Mathieu, & Kukenberger, 2014;Hooker & Csikszentmihalyi, 2003;Pearce & Conger, 2003;Shamir & Lapidot, 2003;Wang et al, 2014). Yet, less is known about the process by which shared leadership influences other organizational phenomena such as caring for others.…”
Section: Shared Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of studies have supported the idea that sharing leadership among organizational members can have a powerful effect on the collective performance of individual employees within interdependent contexts (Avolio, Jung, Murry, & Sivasubramaniam, 1996;D'Innocenzo, Mathieu, & Kukenberger, 2014;Hooker & Csikszentmihalyi, 2003;Pearce & Conger, 2003;Shamir & Lapidot, 2003;Wang et al, 2014). Yet, less is known about the process by which shared leadership influences other organizational phenomena such as caring for others.…”
Section: Shared Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We agree that while a degree of responsibility for motivation rests with the top leader of any group or organization, this does not preclude the possibility of more motivation being created and engendered by managers and teammates who do not occupy formal roles of authority within a team. To wit, consider the case of knowledge workers (e.g., Hooker & Csikszentmihalyi, 2003), whose considerable expertise may form a highly desirable basis of power and leadership -which is consistent with Kerr & Jermier's (1978) articulation of substitutes for leadership -between peers in an effort to develop breakthrough products, processes, or services. On the other hand, consider the case of virtual teams -those that work from geographically dispersed locations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While shared leadership is a relatively new concept in the organizational literature, there have been several rigorous studies of the phenomenon (Avolio et al, 1996;Ensley et al, 2006;Hooker and Csikszentmihalyi, 2003;Pearce, 1997;Pearce and Sims, 2002;Pearce et al, 2004;Shamir and Lapidot, 2003). The initial evidence, encompassing a wide variety of contexts, suggests that shared leadership can have a powerful effect on group and organizational outcomes, as outlined below.…”
Section: Shared Leadership: Toward a More Robust Leadership Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical evidence on shared leadership, thus far, has consistently linked it with positive organizational outcomes (Avolio et al, 1996;Ensley et al, 2006;Hooker and Csikszentmihalyi, 2003;Pearce, 1997;Pearce and Sims, 2002;Pearce et al, 2004;Shamir and Lapidot, 2003). The majority of the research has examined some dimension of performance.…”
Section: Shared Leadership and Csirmentioning
confidence: 99%