2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow conditions influence diuron toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics in freshwater biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All exposure conditions were prepared to ensure that the final concentration of acetonitrile reached 0.25%, which is below the established NOEC. For each condition, three nominal concentrations of diuron were selected: 0, 5 and 50 µg.L -1 (respectively named Ctrl, 5D and 50D, prepared from stock solution in ultrapure water), and the biofilms were exposed to these conditions during one and three days, to ensure that the equilibrium between diuron concentrations in water and in biofilms was reached (Chaumet et al, 2019). Moreover, the 3-day exposure was expected to be enough to highlight likely effects of photoperiod (16/8 photoperiod condition has 37 % more hours of illumination than 10/14 photoperiod condition).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All exposure conditions were prepared to ensure that the final concentration of acetonitrile reached 0.25%, which is below the established NOEC. For each condition, three nominal concentrations of diuron were selected: 0, 5 and 50 µg.L -1 (respectively named Ctrl, 5D and 50D, prepared from stock solution in ultrapure water), and the biofilms were exposed to these conditions during one and three days, to ensure that the equilibrium between diuron concentrations in water and in biofilms was reached (Chaumet et al, 2019). Moreover, the 3-day exposure was expected to be enough to highlight likely effects of photoperiod (16/8 photoperiod condition has 37 % more hours of illumination than 10/14 photoperiod condition).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diuron and its main metabolites (DCPMU and DCPU) in biofilms and water samples were quantified by UPLC-ToF (Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography -Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, Xevo G2-S ToF, Waters) as proceeded in a previous study (see Chaumet et al, 2019). An ACQUITY BEH C18 column 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm (Waters) was used for chromatographic separation at 45°C with a binary gradient of ultrapure water (at pH= 5) and methanol (both solutions with ammonium acetate to a concentration of 10 mM, CAS: 631-61-8, ULC quality Biosolve), and 20 µL of samples were injected.…”
Section: Diuron Quantification In Water and Biofilmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cysteine-rich domain of these proteins contains sulfhydryl groups and would act as trace metal chelating agents on the cell surface (Santos et al, 2013). The protective role of EPS has been also recently disputed under experimental conditions by Chaumet et al (2019), who tested toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling of diuron under different flow conditions. However, evidence suggests that the thick and complicated 3D structure of mature biofilms forms a protective layer which limits the exposure of the inner zones to the external stressors and decreases toxicity of contaminants (Ivorra et al, 2000;Gold et al, 2003a, b).…”
Section: Trace Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed that an insecticide such as fipronil may pose hazards to freshwater primary producers and decomposers. It has been demonstrated that herbicides (Paule et al, 2016;Chaumet et al, 2019;Dorigo et al, 2010) and their mixtures (Ham et al, 2014;Morin et al, 2012;Pesce et al, 2011) affect the microbial and photosynthetic fractions of the periphyton. However, as far as we know there is no information on the ecotoxicity effect of insecticides on biofilms.…”
Section: Effect Of Fipronil On Periphytonmentioning
confidence: 99%