2013
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow compensated quantitative susceptibility mapping for venous oxygenation imaging

Abstract: Purpose Venous blood oxygen saturation is an indicator of brain oxygen consumption and can be measured directly from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) by deconvolving the MR phase signal. However, accurate estimation of the susceptibility of blood may be affected by flow induced phase in the presence of imaging gradient and the inhomogeneous susceptibility field gradient. The purpose of this study is to correct the flow induced error in QSM for improved venous oxygenation quantification. Methods Flow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
166
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our quantified susceptibility values shown in Table 6a in general agree with values (0.37–0.54 ppm) from other recent work [10,13,11]. However, our susceptibility values of 5 veins in different regions of each volunteer’s brain are close to each other.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our quantified susceptibility values shown in Table 6a in general agree with values (0.37–0.54 ppm) from other recent work [10,13,11]. However, our susceptibility values of 5 veins in different regions of each volunteer’s brain are close to each other.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The main disadavntage of their method is the long scan time. The susceptibilities of veins have also been quantified using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) techniques [811,13]. However, the accuracy of quantified susceptibility of a cylindrical object decreases when the size of the object decreases [8,15], mainly due to partial-voluming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently described by Xu et al (2014), a flow-dependent error in Y v -SBO values could potentially arise due to phase accumulation as venous blood travels through an inhomogeneous B 0 field. This flow-dependent phase accumulation will increase quadratically with echo time and linearly with the dot product between the flow velocity and the background field gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this effect alone cannot explain the observed bias between Y v - T 2 and Y v -SBO values, as it would predict the bias to increase in magnitude with increasing flow velocity, whereas the observed bias reverses direction between the low flow (baseline) and high flow (hypercapnia) states. Detailed investigation of this potential source of error will be explored in future work by applying a quadratic phase model – the “adaptive-quadratic fit” as described by Xu et al (2014) – to an SBO sequence with several rephased echoes and longer echo times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike R 2 and R Ã 2 , the relationship between [dH] and tissue susceptibility is linear in its concentration and independent of imaging parameters (11)(12)(13). Hence, QSM can be used to quantify oxygenation in large veins (14)(15)(16)(17)(18) and in tissue (19,20). The [dH] in tissue can be determined from QSM by compensating for contribution from non-heme iron, such as those stored in ferritin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%