2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid T2- and susceptometry-based CMRO2 quantification with interleaved TRUST (iTRUST)

Abstract: Susceptometry-based oximetry (SBO) and T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging (TRUST) are two promising methods for quantifying the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), a critical parameter of brain function. We present a combined method, interleaved TRUST (iTRUST), which achieves rapid, simultaneous quantification of both susceptometry- and T2-based CMRO2 via insertion of a flow-encoded, dual-echo gradient-recalled echo (OxFlow) module within the T1 recovery portion of the TRUST sequence. In addition to allow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportional bias between TRUST and SBO has been suggested by several prior studies, but we demonstrated it in the broad oxygenation range produced. Compared to SBO, TRUST presented significantly lower S v O 2 values under room air and hypoxia conditions but comparable S v O 2 values under hypercapnia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportional bias between TRUST and SBO has been suggested by several prior studies, but we demonstrated it in the broad oxygenation range produced. Compared to SBO, TRUST presented significantly lower S v O 2 values under room air and hypoxia conditions but comparable S v O 2 values under hypercapnia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Barhoum et al compared TRUST and SBO at resting condition and reported slightly lower S v O 2 values provided by TRUST. Rodgers et al performed interleaved TRUST and SBO acquisition in one sequence and observed higher S v O 2 response to hypercapnia indicated by TRUST than SBO. To our knowledge, there has been no comparison of these two methods under low saturation levels such as hypoxia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested previously that hypercapnia reduced metabolic activity in the brain 1,18 while hypoxia increased metabolic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These values are with the typical range of the literature reports. 1,2,12,18,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] But the effect of gas modulation on neural or metabolic activity is not fully understood and is in fact still controversial. This is primarily due to a lack of tools to examine these questions, because one can no longer use vascular surrogate marker (for which plenty of tools are available) and must use direct assessment of neural activity or metabolic rate.…”
Section: 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation