2022
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow and wake characteristics associated with riparian vegetation patches: Results from field‐scale experiments

Abstract: Riparian vegetation patches growing on river banks and floodplains influence in‐channel and overbank hydromorphological processes. The current knowledge on patch‐scale hydrodynamics is largely based on laboratory flume experiments with simplified vegetation. The aim of this study is to provide new understanding of the flow and wake characteristics for real riparian vegetation patches based on field‐scale experiments with natural willows, in order to inform hydromorphological and ecological modelling. The focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, patch widths as low as 1–2 m create wake flows extending up to tens of meters, so that the velocity does not fully recover between the patches (e.g. Caroppi et al, 2022; Marjoribanks et al, 2019). The uncertainty in modelling the mean velocity distributions in partly vegetated flows (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, patch widths as low as 1–2 m create wake flows extending up to tens of meters, so that the velocity does not fully recover between the patches (e.g. Caroppi et al, 2022; Marjoribanks et al, 2019). The uncertainty in modelling the mean velocity distributions in partly vegetated flows (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boxall & Guymer, 2007), which are all influenced at several scales by plants (Marion et al, 2014; Shucksmith et al, 2011). For instance, patches modify the cross‐sectional velocity distributions (Caroppi et al, 2022; Yamasaki et al, 2019) and generate turbulent fluctuations through the vortices at the lateral shear layers between each patch and open water and in the patch wake regions (e.g. Västilä et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of different methods for estimating the drag coefficient described in Section 2.2 is limited exclusively to the case of emergent rigid vegetation when the flow does not affect the leaf apparatus. In the presence of real herbaceous vegetation, the drag coefficient is much lower than that in case of rigid vegetation [41], while it increases significantly when the flow affects the foliage [42][43][44]. It must be said, however, that foliage reconfiguration and inflection of the stems cause a reduction in the area of the affected plant and the drag exerted on it [45,46].…”
Section: Overview and Basic Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Vegetation greatly impacts hydrodynamic processes at multiple scales [17,18], influencing flow organization, geomorphic changes, and habitat dynamics [19,20]. Vegetation introduces additional flow resistance, influencing water-surface elevations and channel conveyance capacity [21,22].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Features Of Vegetated Floodplain Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we expect canopies in transitional regime to be rare in such hydro-environments, under comparable submergence conditions. However, seasonality driven changes in vegetative drag, due for example to shedding of leaves [18], can profoundly alter the canopy drag [54,75]. In these conditions, or for higher flow velocities, the bed drag would assume a higher importance, with the transitional and the sparse regime being relevant for describing the flow structure.…”
Section: Drag Distributions and Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%