2010
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones

Abstract: Whether an animal depends on floral resources determines its response to these signals, suggesting that obligate flower visitors evolved a tolerance against primarily defensive compounds. Therefore, floral scent bouquets in conjunction with nutritious rewards may solve the conflicting tasks of attracting mutualists while repelling antagonists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
119
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the perennial herb Hesperis matronalis (Brassicaceae), the effects of temperature on floral scent production is nearly opposite to the patterns observed for the Lithophragma species studied here, with aromatics being less affected by low temperature than monoterpenes (Nielsen et al 1995). Thus, the variation in reaction norms between different compounds also could be dynamic and species-specific, and thereby reflect different ecological functions or evolutionary histories for different classes of volatiles (e.g., attractants vs. repellents) in each local environment (Junker and Blüthgen 2010;Theis et al 2007). Under this hypothesis, volatile compounds with emission rates most strongly tailored towards the daytime may be especially important for interaction with Greya moths.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…In the perennial herb Hesperis matronalis (Brassicaceae), the effects of temperature on floral scent production is nearly opposite to the patterns observed for the Lithophragma species studied here, with aromatics being less affected by low temperature than monoterpenes (Nielsen et al 1995). Thus, the variation in reaction norms between different compounds also could be dynamic and species-specific, and thereby reflect different ecological functions or evolutionary histories for different classes of volatiles (e.g., attractants vs. repellents) in each local environment (Junker and Blüthgen 2010;Theis et al 2007). Under this hypothesis, volatile compounds with emission rates most strongly tailored towards the daytime may be especially important for interaction with Greya moths.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, Xylocopa are efficient pollination agents, mainly for plants such as Mouriri with poricidal anthers (Buchmann 1983). Poricidal anthers could be a strategy for avoiding the harvest of pollen grains by less efficient visitors (Junker and Blüthgen 2010;De Luca and Vallejo-Marin 2013), reducing the numbers of visiting bees, as found in Tibouchina, Comolia and Mouriri (Buchmann and Buchmann 1981;Buchmann 1983;Oliveira-Rebouças and Gimenes 2004). Furthermore, the large quantity of pollen produced and the heteranthery presented by Mouriri flowers may, in part, contribute to mitigate the problem of the "pollen dilemma," guaranteeing their reproductive and feeding success (Vallejo-Marin et al 2009).…”
Section: Acta Amazonicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Animalmediated selection on scent is predicted to be balancing due to conflicting selection pressures, if scents attract both mutualists and antagonists 4 but directional if a scent simultaneously attracts pollinators and repels enemies. 5 Of course, scent blends are generally composed of many volatiles and, thus, it is possible that different components of the blend will be under different forms of selection. 6 However, due to the difficulty of conducting large-scale scent collections in the field, as well as the necessity of specialized equipment and expertise, our knowledge of the evolutionary ecology of scents is elementary.…”
Section: Phenotypic Selection On Floral Scentmentioning
confidence: 99%