2010
DOI: 10.1080/01904160903575873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral Analysis as a New Approach to Evaluate the Nutritional Status of Olive Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As flowers in many fruit tree species appear well before any leaf material is present, this makes it possible to detect nutritional disorders very early in the season (Sanz and Montañés, 1995) and to prognose abnormal nutrition before symptoms appear (Montañés Millán et al, 1997). Flower analysis seems to be reliable at predicting macronutrient (N and P) and micronutrient (Cu, Zn, and Mn) levels in 'Arbequina' olive, as concentrations at the petal whitening stage were significantly correlated with the contents in leaves taken later, at the stone hardening stage, which coincides with the standard date for leaf sampling (Ben Khelil et al, 2010). Flower analysis could also determine the concentration of Fe for the prognosis of Fe deficiency of pear and peach trees in soils with a high pH and high total and active lime contents as an alternative to the analysis of leaf samples taken at 60 and 120 DAFB from pear trees and at 60 DAFB from peach trees (Sanz and Montañés, 1995).…”
Section: ) Flower Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As flowers in many fruit tree species appear well before any leaf material is present, this makes it possible to detect nutritional disorders very early in the season (Sanz and Montañés, 1995) and to prognose abnormal nutrition before symptoms appear (Montañés Millán et al, 1997). Flower analysis seems to be reliable at predicting macronutrient (N and P) and micronutrient (Cu, Zn, and Mn) levels in 'Arbequina' olive, as concentrations at the petal whitening stage were significantly correlated with the contents in leaves taken later, at the stone hardening stage, which coincides with the standard date for leaf sampling (Ben Khelil et al, 2010). Flower analysis could also determine the concentration of Fe for the prognosis of Fe deficiency of pear and peach trees in soils with a high pH and high total and active lime contents as an alternative to the analysis of leaf samples taken at 60 and 120 DAFB from pear trees and at 60 DAFB from peach trees (Sanz and Montañés, 1995).…”
Section: ) Flower Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For many commercial tree crops, nutrient concentrations of tissues including flowers, entire inflorescences, leaf petioles, pedicels (stems of individual flowers and fruit), and young developing fruit have proven to be valuable sources of supplemental information or alternatives to leaf analysis for diagnosing tree nutrient status (Castillo-Gonzalez et al, 2000;Khelil et al, 2010;Martinez et al, 2003;Nyomora et al, 1997;Razeto and Castro, 2007;Razeto and Salgado, 2004;Sanz and Carrera, 1994). The greater sensitivity of inflorescence and fruit pedicel tissues than leaves for quantifying changes in tree nutrient status relative to yield has been demonstrated for avocado trees in Chile (Razeto and Castro, 2007;Razeto and Salgado, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to what has been reported for avocado (Persea americana) (Campisi-Pinto et al, 2017), it could be possible that leaf analysis is not sensitive enough to detect changes in macronutrient status of 'Nadorcott' mandarin trees, or differences in fertilization rates that may affect fruit load or result in the manifestation of alternate bearing. For example, in other evergreen fruit trees such as avocado, coffee (Coffea arabica), and olive (Olea europaea), organs such as flowers, petioles of leaves, and stems of flowers and fruit are alternative tree organs from which nutrient analyses provide valuable supplemental information to leaf nutrient analyses (Campisi-Pinto et al, 2017;Castillo-Gonzalez et al, 2000;Khelil et al, 2010;Martinez et al, 2003;Razeto and Salgado, 2004). Indeed, studies on mineral nutrients and alternate bearing in other mandarin cultivars, e.g., 'Kinnow' (Mirsoleimani et al, 2014) and 'Michal', 'Wilking', and 'Murcott' (Monselise et al, 1983), have shown that the effects of fruit load in the current season on bud responses in the following season are also closely related to the nutrient concentration in stems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%