2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04267-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood vulnerability and its influencing factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak discharge was calculated using the SWAT model, and the peak discharge was included as one of the indications. The General Circulation Models (GCM) data were used to forecast future rainfall, while Landsat pictures were used to create land use and land (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021) (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021) (Pathak et al, 2020), (Hoque et al, 2019) (Mavhura et al, 2017), (Terti et al, 2015) (Eidsvig et al, 2014), (Zhang, 2009) Physical vulnerability Interdependency analysis, indicator methodology, decision-making trial method., Indicator based approach, morphometric parameters were derived from SRTM DEM data using (GIS), Weighted Sum Approach (WSA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and an Integrated Approach (IA), GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach, Geospatial Indicator-Based Approach and Participatory Analytical Hierarchy Process, Flood generating factors: slope, elevation, land use/land cover, drainage density, rainfall, and soil types were rated and collected to mark out flood vulnerability zones using (GIS), Regression and GIS conditioning factors include digital elevation model (DEM), Pearson's correlation, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity analyses (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021), (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021), (Vignesh et al, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Desalegn and Mulu, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Sami et al, 2020), (D'Ayala et al, 2020), (Chuang et al, 2020), (Yin et al, 2019), (Hoque et al, 2019), Sajjad, 2019), Hübl et al, 2016), (Al-Juaidi et al, 2018), (Hazarika et al, 2018), (Walliman et al, 2012) and, (Mehebub et al, 2015) Environmental…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and A Brief Discussion On P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak discharge was calculated using the SWAT model, and the peak discharge was included as one of the indications. The General Circulation Models (GCM) data were used to forecast future rainfall, while Landsat pictures were used to create land use and land (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021) (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021) (Pathak et al, 2020), (Hoque et al, 2019) (Mavhura et al, 2017), (Terti et al, 2015) (Eidsvig et al, 2014), (Zhang, 2009) Physical vulnerability Interdependency analysis, indicator methodology, decision-making trial method., Indicator based approach, morphometric parameters were derived from SRTM DEM data using (GIS), Weighted Sum Approach (WSA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and an Integrated Approach (IA), GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach, Geospatial Indicator-Based Approach and Participatory Analytical Hierarchy Process, Flood generating factors: slope, elevation, land use/land cover, drainage density, rainfall, and soil types were rated and collected to mark out flood vulnerability zones using (GIS), Regression and GIS conditioning factors include digital elevation model (DEM), Pearson's correlation, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity analyses (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021), (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021), (Vignesh et al, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Desalegn and Mulu, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Sami et al, 2020), (D'Ayala et al, 2020), (Chuang et al, 2020), (Yin et al, 2019), (Hoque et al, 2019), Sajjad, 2019), Hübl et al, 2016), (Al-Juaidi et al, 2018), (Hazarika et al, 2018), (Walliman et al, 2012) and, (Mehebub et al, 2015) Environmental…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and A Brief Discussion On P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study dealt with historical and present-day flood vulnerabilities in Mopani District, projections of future vulnerabilities under climate change are even more important. Moreover, focusing on regional sensitivity, adaptive capacity and local exposure is critical in understanding local vulnerabilities and flood-related impacts [80]. This helps the policy and decision makers, and civil protection and disaster managers, to know exactly where to concentrate and invest to deal with risk and hazards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardized value is multiplied with the component 1 score obtained from the PCA to get the respective index value. Similar procedure was used by Pathak et al [36] on study of flood vulnerability in Saptari district of Nepal. A higher value of vulnerability index indicates lower vulnerability and vice versa.…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%