2010
DOI: 10.1080/02626660903546092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood frequency analysis using historical data: accounting for random and systematic errors

Abstract: 2010) Flood frequency analysis using historical data: accounting for random and systematic errors. Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(2), 192-208. Abstract Flood frequency analysis based on a set of systematic data and a set of historical floods is applied to several Mediterranean catchments. After identification and collection of data on historical floods, several hydraulic models were constructed to account for geomorphological changes. Recent and historical rating curves were constructed and applied to reconstruct flood… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
88
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the River Gardon (southern France), the frequency pattern of large floods (> 50-year floods) has decreased since the late 19th century, whereas the extraordinary and ordinary floods increased during the 20th century ( Fig. 8c) (Sheffer et al, 2008;Neppel et al, 2010). Similarly, historical flood series from north-eastern Spain indicate a lack of statistical significant trend for large catastrophic floods, whereas extraordinary floods show a significant rise, especially since 1850 (Barrera-Escoda and Llasat, 2015).…”
Section: Flood Magnitude Sensitivity To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the River Gardon (southern France), the frequency pattern of large floods (> 50-year floods) has decreased since the late 19th century, whereas the extraordinary and ordinary floods increased during the 20th century ( Fig. 8c) (Sheffer et al, 2008;Neppel et al, 2010). Similarly, historical flood series from north-eastern Spain indicate a lack of statistical significant trend for large catastrophic floods, whereas extraordinary floods show a significant rise, especially since 1850 (Barrera-Escoda and Llasat, 2015).…”
Section: Flood Magnitude Sensitivity To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Table 1 shows a compilation of 46 case studies with historical discharge estimates at sites with multiple floods with discharge estimates published in peer review papers or being cross-checked with the original historical sources. Numerous studies suggest that current flood magnitudes are not unusual within the context of last 1000 years, with good examples for the rivers Rhine (Herget and Meurs, 2010;Wetter et al, 2011), Tiber (Calenda et al, 2005), Llobregat (Thorndycraft et al, 2005), Trent (Macdonald, 2013) and Gardon (Sheffer et al, 2008;Neppel et al, 2010). In general, the largest historical floods from the last 500 years show higher peak flows than the largest gauged floods (Fig.…”
Section: Discharge Of Historical Floods In the Context Of Instrumentamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parent and Bernier 2003;Reis and Stedinger 2005;Neppel et al 2010). As discussed in Stedinger and Cohn (1986) the likelihood in Eq.…”
Section: The Inclusion Of Historical Data For Frequency Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La prise en compte de cette information supplémentaire dans l'estimation des paramètres d'une loi statistique (p.ex. loi GEV) permet de réduire les incertitudes sur l'estimation des quantiles rares (Naulet et al 2005, Neppel et al 2011, Payrastre et al 2011.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified