2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood frequency analysis on the Ardèche river using French documentary sources from the last two centuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is often some trade-off between the length of the historical period for which information can be retrieved, and the level at which the perception threshold can be reliably fixed, as information on very large floods which happened in the far past might be available, but it would then be unclear what perception threshold could be used since it is assumed that all historical events in the sample are higher than X 0 . A possible approach to this would be to use varying perception threshold, as done for example in Naulet et al (2005), although this requires a very thorough study of the history of the catchment. Further, as mentioned earlier in the paper, considerations on the suitability of using information from a time in which the catchment was likely very different from its present form also need to be taken into account.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is often some trade-off between the length of the historical period for which information can be retrieved, and the level at which the perception threshold can be reliably fixed, as information on very large floods which happened in the far past might be available, but it would then be unclear what perception threshold could be used since it is assumed that all historical events in the sample are higher than X 0 . A possible approach to this would be to use varying perception threshold, as done for example in Naulet et al (2005), although this requires a very thorough study of the history of the catchment. Further, as mentioned earlier in the paper, considerations on the suitability of using information from a time in which the catchment was likely very different from its present form also need to be taken into account.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common historical flood discharge calculations are applied to gradually varied flow conditions (Benito et al, 2003a;Lang et al, 2004;Naulet et al, 2005). River channel geometry is generally irregular in shape and surface roughness, resulting in non-uniform flow conditions.…”
Section: Discharge Estimation From Documentary Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many documentary-based flood studies shown that flood frequency has been influenced by the internal variability of atmospheric circulation, with flood clusters at some time periods (Glaser et al, 2010), or by impacts on the environmental patterns such as land use (Benito et al, 2010) and engineering works (Machado et al, 2015). A simple test of stationarity for censored samples (systematic and/or non-systematic) was proposed by Lang et al (1999) assuming that the flood series can be described by a homogenous Poisson process (Naulet et al, 2005). It is recommended to select a sample above a high discharge threshold in order to produce an exhaustive and homogeneous set, avoiding bias in relation with archive availability or flood risk exposure .…”
Section: Flood Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La prise en compte de cette information supplémentaire dans l'estimation des paramètres d'une loi statistique (p.ex. loi GEV) permet de réduire les incertitudes sur l'estimation des quantiles rares (Naulet et al 2005, Neppel et al 2011, Payrastre et al 2011.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified