2018
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2018.1426055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood estimation at ungauged catchments of western catchments of Karnataka, West coast of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SW3, the values of t p , t b and Q p were 2.85 h, 10.62 h and 95.10 m 3 /s. Reddy et al (2019) had worked on the different SUH methods for flood estimation at the ungauged catchments of the West coast of Karnataka, India. They identified that the CWC is also a suitable method for the study area.…”
Section: Central Water Commission (Cwc) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SW3, the values of t p , t b and Q p were 2.85 h, 10.62 h and 95.10 m 3 /s. Reddy et al (2019) had worked on the different SUH methods for flood estimation at the ungauged catchments of the West coast of Karnataka, India. They identified that the CWC is also a suitable method for the study area.…”
Section: Central Water Commission (Cwc) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salami et al (2017) again recommended the SCS method to estimate the ordinate required to develop peak runoff hydrograph for Ogun-Osun river catchment, south-west, Nigeria. Reddy et al (2019) had identified that the CWC is also a suitable method for the ungauged catchments of the West coast of Karnataka, India. Pradipta & Nurhady (2019) concluded the SCS method was determined as the representative SUH in Juana Watershed, Indonesia Idfi et al (2020) identified SCS has a high level of accuracy for Ngotok River watershed, Indonesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is based on UH averages for a large number of watersheds calculated from gauged precipitation and runoff (HEC, 2000) [8]. SCS-UH was chosen because it is widely used and is more reliable in calculating runoff rate and produces better results than the Synder unit hydrograph method [58]. Lag time is the only input for this method.…”
Section: Ii) Transform Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%