2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9661-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour

Abstract: Our aim was to characterise the suspension rheology of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) in relation to flocculation of the cellulose fibrils. Measurements were carried out using a rotational rheometer and a transparent cylindrical measuring system that allows combining visual information to rheological parameters. The photographs were analyzed for their floc size distribution. Conclusions were drawn by comparing the photographs and data obtained from measurements. Variables selected for examination of MFC susp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
113
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The floc structure is to some extent similar to pulp suspensions (Saarikoski et al 2012); although MFC fibers have significantly smaller dimensions and a higher aspect ratio than pulp fibers. The flocculated structure of MFC (Saarikoski et al 2012) and pulp suspensions (Beghello 1998;Wågberg and Nordqvist 1999;Chen et al 2002;Björkman 2003a, b) have been studied by imaging. At rest, the flocs can be described as areas of higher fiber density within a network (Björkman 2000;Kerekes 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The floc structure is to some extent similar to pulp suspensions (Saarikoski et al 2012); although MFC fibers have significantly smaller dimensions and a higher aspect ratio than pulp fibers. The flocculated structure of MFC (Saarikoski et al 2012) and pulp suspensions (Beghello 1998;Wågberg and Nordqvist 1999;Chen et al 2002;Björkman 2003a, b) have been studied by imaging. At rest, the flocs can be described as areas of higher fiber density within a network (Björkman 2000;Kerekes 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…At rest, the flocs can be described as areas of higher fiber density within a network (Björkman 2000;Kerekes 2006). Under shear, the network breaks gradually, and at sufficiently high shear rates, the suspension flows as individual flocs (Björkman 2006;Saarikoski et al 2012), and the floc size diminishes with increasing shear rate (Björkman 2005;Saarikoski et al 2012). The floc strength is determined by number of contacts and cohesive forces present between the fibers (Kerekes et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the furnish with higher consistency exhibited higher dynamic viscosity throughout the shear range. The shear thinning behavior for both consistencies indicate that the structure was broken as more shear was applied, which is typical for MFC containing furnishes (Lasseuguette et al 2008;Iotti et al 2011;Karppinen et al 2011;Saarikoski et al 2012;Dimic-Misic et al 2013b). This result shows the potential of tuning the viscosity by applying shear to the furnish, which is relevant for any pumping or mixing operations in a manufacturing process.…”
Section: Steady-state Flow Curvesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the case of the KCl dispersive agent, the shear viscosity of MFC suspension remained rather low, at only 135 cP even after 70 min of ultrasonication. Because the high viscosity of MFC suspension is primarily caused by the strongly entangled and disordered gel networks formed by inherently connected cellulose fibrils, the reduction in the viscosity of the MFC suspension with KCl solution as a dispersive agent could be attributed to the weakening or even full breakage of this network by breaking the balance between repulsive and attractive forces between the fibrils with the salt addition (Saarikoski et al 2012).…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%