2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floating treatment wetlands integrated with microbial fuel cell for the treatment of urban wastewaters and bioenergy generation

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to develop a combined system composed of anaerobic biofilter (AF) and floating treatment wetlands (FTW) coupled with microbial fuel cells (MFC) in the buoyant support for treating wastewater from a university campus and generate bioelectricity. The raw wastewater was pumped to a 1,450 L tank, operated in batch flow and filled with plastic conduits. The second treatment stage was composed of a 1000 L FTW box with a 200 L plastic drum inside (acting as settler in the entran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, the removals of COD, TP, and TN were 71.4%, 11.4%, and 8.4%, respectively, with a retention time of seven days for three weeks (seven days/cycle, a total of three cycles). The COD removal efficiencies (71.4%) reported by Colares et al (2021) [51] are lower than the removal (80.4%) produced in the present study, while the phosphate removal efficiencies in their study and the present study are at the same level (11.4%). It should be noted that the run time of the present study was 28 days as compared to 21 days in the work by Colares et al (2021) [51].…”
Section: Nutrient and Cod Removalcontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their study, the removals of COD, TP, and TN were 71.4%, 11.4%, and 8.4%, respectively, with a retention time of seven days for three weeks (seven days/cycle, a total of three cycles). The COD removal efficiencies (71.4%) reported by Colares et al (2021) [51] are lower than the removal (80.4%) produced in the present study, while the phosphate removal efficiencies in their study and the present study are at the same level (11.4%). It should be noted that the run time of the present study was 28 days as compared to 21 days in the work by Colares et al (2021) [51].…”
Section: Nutrient and Cod Removalcontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The maximum power density and the maximum current density produced in the present study are considerably larger than those reported by Yadav et al (2020) [47]. Colares et al (2021) [51] treated urban wastewater using a floating treatment wetlands-MFC with Canna generalis, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Cyperus papyrus Nanus, Hymenachne grumosa, and Equisetum hyemale. These plants were placed in floating supports and connected in parallel.…”
Section: Mfc-hyp Performancecontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are multifunctional devices used for electricity generation and wastewater degradation through the metabolism of electrogenic bacteria. [2] The key electrode is the cathode, while oxygen acts as an electron acceptor in air cathode MFCs. [3] When potassium ferricyanide was used as the electron acceptor in the cathode compartment, the key electrode was the anode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are transferred outward from the anode through the medium and the anode is connected to the cathode by an external circuit (Ahmadpour et al 2020). In recent years, studies have shown that the MFC system has a good removal effect for refractory organic matter and can use the easily degradable organic matter as a matrix to generate electricity (Lim et al 2021;González et al 2020;Colares et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%