2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floating treatment wetlands for heavy metal removal in highway stormwater ponds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, a pond with floating plant mats showed 41% more reduction in TSS than a pond without any FTW system . The average TSS removal rates in many earlier studies were reported between 2.7 and 7.1 g m −2 per day with a highest removal rate of 45 g m −2 per day . Besides entrapment, role of microbial community is evident only when a major portion of suspended solid is organic …”
Section: Pollutants Removal Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Likewise, a pond with floating plant mats showed 41% more reduction in TSS than a pond without any FTW system . The average TSS removal rates in many earlier studies were reported between 2.7 and 7.1 g m −2 per day with a highest removal rate of 45 g m −2 per day . Besides entrapment, role of microbial community is evident only when a major portion of suspended solid is organic …”
Section: Pollutants Removal Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Accordingly, the lower redox conditions and slightly higher organic loading of a wetland receiving the effluent of an HUSB reactor resulted in CH 4 emissions twelve times higher than those of the wetland fed with primary settled wastewater. Ladislas et al (2015) investigated the efficiency of a floating treatment wetland (basin surface 375 m 2 ) for removing dissolved metals from stormwater runoff from a section of highway (27,000 vehicles d À1 ) in northeast Nantes, France. Three floating marshes were anchored in the retention pond, each raft with a surface area of 1.5 m 2 supporting Juncus and Carex plants.…”
Section: This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the rapid increase in the number of vehicles in the world, an increasing amount of surface water and soil near highways is contaminated by road transport pollution via highway runoff (Viard, Pihan, Promeyrat, & Pihan, ). As one of the most common sources of pollution, highway stormwater runoff typically contains heavy metals (i.e., copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), and iron (Fe)) and nutrients (nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K)), all of which are discharged into the natural surface, where they impair both ecosystems and human health (Huang, Pedersen, Fischer, Richard White, & Young, ; Kasaraneni, Schifman, Boving, & Oyanedelcraver, ; Ladislas, Gérente, Chazarenc, Brisson, & Andrès, ; Terzakis et al, ). The presence of different heavy metal species in highway stormwater runoff can mainly be attributed to both automobile‐use activities and industrial activities, and particularly prevalent sources are the disintegration of vehicle brakes and tires as well as atmospheric deposition (Gunawardana, Goonetilleke, & Egodawatta, ; Zhao, Li, & Wang, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%