1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02447.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight kinematics and energetics in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with reference to the influence of ground effect

Abstract: The kinematics of flight in the little brown bat are described, both with and without the influence of ground effect. These data are used to estimate aerodynamic power costs and the reduction in power due to ground effect. The significance of ground effect to the foraging energetics of this species is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lighthill [6] pointed out that reduction of the induced velocity can be viewed as an interaction between the vortex wake generated by the wings and an opposing vortex structure actuated by the ground via a mirroring effect. Whereas the aerodynamic advantages of forward locomotion in ground effect have been modelled for birds [7][8][9], little brown bats [10] and flying fish [11] (see also [12][13][14]), the actual mechanical as well as metabolic consequences of such flight have yet to be systematically characterized. These advantages would be expected to be maximal for hovering, based on the associated power savings experimentally found for helicopters flying close to the ground [1,2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lighthill [6] pointed out that reduction of the induced velocity can be viewed as an interaction between the vortex wake generated by the wings and an opposing vortex structure actuated by the ground via a mirroring effect. Whereas the aerodynamic advantages of forward locomotion in ground effect have been modelled for birds [7][8][9], little brown bats [10] and flying fish [11] (see also [12][13][14]), the actual mechanical as well as metabolic consequences of such flight have yet to be systematically characterized. These advantages would be expected to be maximal for hovering, based on the associated power savings experimentally found for helicopters flying close to the ground [1,2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed the study of wing kinematics from the elbow to the very tip in much detail (Norberg 1976b;Aldridge 1988;Tian et al 2006;Norberg and Winter 2006;Swartz et al 2006;Swartz et al 2007;Riskin et al 2008;etc. ).…”
Section: Kinematics Of Chiropteran Wingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Contrary to the elbow and more distal points of the wing, the shoulder joint position was rarely traced on motion pictures (Aldridge 1988;Swartz et al 2007), since it is technically difficult to locate even with the help of skin markers (Riskin et al 2008). The motion of the shoulder girdle is even harder to analyze since the scapula and clavicle are incorporated in the thorax.…”
Section: Kinematics Of Chiropteran Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations