2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural fatigue evaluation of cement-treated mixtures of reclaimed asphalt pavement and crushed aggregates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They kept about 10% of their initial stiffness after 10 years, even with the addition of a cold recycled cement-treated subbase layer in the structure. It is worth noting that Castañeda López et al [6] studied the laboratory fatigue behavior of mixtures made of RAP, aggregates and cement, reporting the superior behavior of a mixture with 4% cement and 50% RAP, similar to the present one. Furthermore, Fedrigo et al [12] reported that the laboratory fatigue behavior of RAP, soil and cement mixtures improved with increasing RAP contents.…”
Section: Crctmsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They kept about 10% of their initial stiffness after 10 years, even with the addition of a cold recycled cement-treated subbase layer in the structure. It is worth noting that Castañeda López et al [6] studied the laboratory fatigue behavior of mixtures made of RAP, aggregates and cement, reporting the superior behavior of a mixture with 4% cement and 50% RAP, similar to the present one. Furthermore, Fedrigo et al [12] reported that the laboratory fatigue behavior of RAP, soil and cement mixtures improved with increasing RAP contents.…”
Section: Crctmsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The flexural tensile strain at the break of the studied CRCTMs was presented in Table 2 (Section 2.2). Such values are higher than those typically observed in the literature for traditional cement-treated materials due to the presence of RAP in the mixtures, which makes them more flexible [6,12].…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations