2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Internally Prestressed with Unbonded Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Tendons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study by some of the current authors (Heo et al, 2013), six simply supported concrete beams post-tensioned with unbonded straight CFRP tendons were tested. The main parameters were the reinforcement ratio of the unbonded prestressing CFRP tendon, the magnitude of the initial prestrain and the section shape (rectangular or T-section).…”
Section: Comparison With Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study by some of the current authors (Heo et al, 2013), six simply supported concrete beams post-tensioned with unbonded straight CFRP tendons were tested. The main parameters were the reinforcement ratio of the unbonded prestressing CFRP tendon, the magnitude of the initial prestrain and the section shape (rectangular or T-section).…”
Section: Comparison With Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the beam fabrication, loading and measurement, as well as the experimental results of the overall flexural behaviour of the tested beams have been reported in detail elsewhere (Heo et al, 2013), the discussion here is focused mainly on the load-deflection properties of the tested beams observed in the previous research. Table 3 summarises the mechanical properties of the CFRP tendons, the non-prestressed auxiliary bonded steel and the CFRP reinforcements and stirrups used in the test.…”
Section: Tests -A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed that the calculated ductility overestimates the measured ones and need further refinement. [8] Braimah et al tested five unbonded post-tensioned concrete beams with two different prestressing reinforcement types (prestressing CFRP and steel) under fatigue flexural loading. The steel post-tensioned beams had bonded non-prestressed steel reinforcement, while the CFRP post-tensioned beams had bonded nonprestressed GFRP rods.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%