2019
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201905241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Pressure Sensors for Objective Assessment of Motor Disorders

Abstract: Monitoring body motion is relevant to motor control disorders as well as assessment of fine motor skills in child development. Furthermore, motion tracking is necessary for rehabilitation monitoring and injury prevention and benefits both sick and healthy individuals. Flexible pressure sensors based on resistors, capacitors, inductors, or transistors are reviewed in the context of healthcare measurements, ranging from physiological signals to body movement characteristics such as grip and gait. To demonstrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(206 reference statements)
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[109] However, they still suffer from disadvantages in nonlinear sensitivity [105,131,132] and high drift over time, and are also sensitive to the thermal effect. [133] Cheng et al developed a flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor which operated at a voltage of 1.5 V with low energy consumption (<30 mW), ultralow limit of detection of 13 Pa within a short time (<17 ms), high sensitivity (>1.14 kPa −1 ), and high stability, enabling real-time monitoring of the BP of a human radial artery under both a normal condition and after physical exercise, as shown in Figure 4c. [108] This flexible pressure sensor was composed of a layer of ultrathin AuNWs-impregnated tissue paper sandwiched by an interdigitated electrode coated on PDMS and a blank PDMS support.…”
Section: Pressure Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[109] However, they still suffer from disadvantages in nonlinear sensitivity [105,131,132] and high drift over time, and are also sensitive to the thermal effect. [133] Cheng et al developed a flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor which operated at a voltage of 1.5 V with low energy consumption (<30 mW), ultralow limit of detection of 13 Pa within a short time (<17 ms), high sensitivity (>1.14 kPa −1 ), and high stability, enabling real-time monitoring of the BP of a human radial artery under both a normal condition and after physical exercise, as shown in Figure 4c. [108] This flexible pressure sensor was composed of a layer of ultrathin AuNWs-impregnated tissue paper sandwiched by an interdigitated electrode coated on PDMS and a blank PDMS support.…”
Section: Pressure Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where A is the overlapping area of the two parallel plates, Δ 0 is the permittivity of a vacuum, Δ r is the relative permittivity of the elastomeric dielectric materials between the parallel plates, and d is the separation between the parallel plates. The advantages of the piezocapacitive pressure sensors include low insensitivity to temperature and humidity change, [133] low-power consumption, [114,141] low detection limit, [111,112] and high sensitivity. [111,113] However, piezocapacitive pressure sensors have a relatively small linear dynamic range [142,143] and can be disturbed by electromagnetic interference and parasitically coupled to the surroundings.…”
Section: Pressure Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This processing power also enables more efficient human‐machine interfaces such that researchers can collect, and make sense of, data sets on the human body at large scales. [ 162 ]…”
Section: Looking Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glove only needs to fit the physician user, so that our tool can be readily applied to different patients. The instrumented glove record the force applied to move the spastic muscle F and the maneuver velocity v through flexible force-sensitive sensors [31][32][33][34] and an inertial motion unit (IMU), respectively. These two parameters are measured to determine the power P exerted to move the spastic muscle (P ÂŒ F * v), as a third parameter in spasticity evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%