1998
DOI: 10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Implications for Persuasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
91
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…information is processed heuristically (Chaiken and Maheshwaran 1994, Petty et al 1998, Simpson et al 2000, Cohen 2003, Menon and Blount 2003, Chang 2004, Pornpitakpan 2004, Kang and Herr 2006. As expected, our control variables suggest that sales decrease as Amazon's price increases (Chevalier andMayzlin 2006, Ghose et al 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Identity Disclosure On Salessupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…information is processed heuristically (Chaiken and Maheshwaran 1994, Petty et al 1998, Simpson et al 2000, Cohen 2003, Menon and Blount 2003, Chang 2004, Pornpitakpan 2004, Kang and Herr 2006. As expected, our control variables suggest that sales decrease as Amazon's price increases (Chevalier andMayzlin 2006, Ghose et al 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Identity Disclosure On Salessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…First, theory and extensive empirical evidence in psychology and marketing suggest that source characteristics have a direct impact on product evaluation regardless of the content of the message transmitted by the source (Hass 1981, Chaiken and Maheshwaran 1994, Petty et al 1998, Simpson et al 2000, Cohen 2003, Menon and Blount 2003, Chang 2004, Pornpitakpan 2004, Kang and Kerr 2006. Generally, these findings emerge when recipients process messages in a heuristic manner (whether because they are motivated, disposed, or contextually led to do so).…”
Section: Review Valence Identity Disclosure Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, when people know they will be judged on accuracy, they are more accurate in evaluating their own abilities (Armor & Taylor, 2002). However, Petty, Wegener, & White (1998) caution that motivation for accuracy may not be enough to attenuate bias, but that bias can also occur in the correction process. Nevertheless, Kruglanski & Mayseless (1987) report that a high need for accuracy (what they call a heightened fear of invalidity) motivates people to seek comparison with those who disagree with them.…”
Section: §322 Accuracy and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on correction finds that consumers correct when they a) are motivated and able to correct, b) perceive a biasing influence, and c) hold beliefs about the direction of influence (Petty et al,1998;Wegener & Petty, 1995;. When consumers are motivated to correct their judgments, they evaluate the situation and correct for salient sources of influence such as the credibility of the recommender (Wegener & Petty, 1995).…”
Section: Moderation By Source Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%