2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1428408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat conduction-band alignment at the CdS/CuInSe2 thin-film solar-cell heterojunction

Abstract: By combining ultraviolet and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with inverse photoemission spectroscopy, we find that the conduction-band alignment at the CdS/CuInSe2 thin-film solar- cell heterojunction is flat (0.0+/-0.2 eV). Furthermore, we observe a valence-band offset of 0.8+/-0.2 eV. The electronic level alignment is dominated by (1) an unusually large surface band gap of the CuInSe2 thin film (1.4 eV), (2) by a reduced surface band gap of the CdS overlayer (2.2 eV) due to intermixing effects, and (3) by a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
161
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(18 reference statements)
20
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there is ample evidence that the Cu-poor region providing the internal valence band offset is present at the surface of the absorber. [34][35][36] It is therefore reasonable to conclude that a Cu-poor region at the GBs is more likely to be present toward the surface of the absorber than toward the back contact. Second, measurements of the majority-carrier transport properties of CIGS films in coplanar geometry, i.e., perpendicular to many GBs, exhibit activation energies in a range between 60 and 120 meV, 41 i.e., much smaller than an effective internal band offset.…”
Section: A Excess Barrier Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, there is ample evidence that the Cu-poor region providing the internal valence band offset is present at the surface of the absorber. [34][35][36] It is therefore reasonable to conclude that a Cu-poor region at the GBs is more likely to be present toward the surface of the absorber than toward the back contact. Second, measurements of the majority-carrier transport properties of CIGS films in coplanar geometry, i.e., perpendicular to many GBs, exhibit activation energies in a range between 60 and 120 meV, 41 i.e., much smaller than an effective internal band offset.…”
Section: A Excess Barrier Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The effect of this internal offset at the GBs could be of similar importance as it is at the surface of the absorber, 33 whereas, there is ample experimental evidence for the Cu-poor surface layer 34,35 and its beneficial consequences for the performance of CIGS solar cells as long as the overall film composition is Cu-poor, 36 the question whether or not such a Cu-poor layer is a general positive feature of GBs in CIGS is still under discussion. [37][38][39][40] The present study concentrates on investigating the effect of such an internal band offset and on finding the conditions that have to be fulfilled if the Cu-poor layer should have a decisive beneficial effect on the performance of polycrystalline CIGS solar cells.…”
Section: A Excess Barrier Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na Cu ). 20 As a consequence, the total amount of positive charges close to the CIGSe surface and the related downward band bending toward the CIGSe surface (repeatedly indicated by photoemission experiments, as the Fermi energy is closer to conduction band minimum than to the valence band maximum [56][57][58] ) would be reduced. This reduction of the downward band bending could also be interpreted as a relative upward band bending, and so this reasoning is consistent with our photoemission data.…”
Section: E Binding Energy Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hard X-ray [77]) would be required to measure the bulk gap. Ref 22 noted that in a polycrystalline semiconductor a surface gap larger than that of the bulk is not unusual [78], due to possible structural and/or compositional differences between bulk and surface. Further studies are clearly necessary to clarify the difference between surface and bulk WO 3 quasiparticle gaps.…”
Section: Photoemission Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%