2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12519-010-0032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flash visual evoked potentials at 2-year-old infants with different birth weights

Abstract: The latency of the P2 main wave on FVEPs was delayed more significantly in premature infants than in full-term infants at 2 years of corrected age. The visual functional development was delayed in premature infants, especially in VLBW infants (gestational age <32 weeks). The FVEPs were reported low but there were statistically significant correlations between measures of visual cognition and P2 peak latency. As a noninvasive and convenient method, FVEPs are useful in assessing certain aspects of an infant's vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giapros et al concluded that FVEP developmental pattern of preterm infants was similar to that of healthy full-term infants; the former had deficits in visual electrophysiologic maturation, especially for very low birth weight children [ 26 ]. Feng et al noticed that latency of the P2 main wave on FVEPs was delayed more significantly in premature infants than in full-term infants [ 27 ]. They ascertained that the visual functional development was delayed in preterm born infants, especially in infants with very low birth weight and in gestational age less than 32 weeks [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Giapros et al concluded that FVEP developmental pattern of preterm infants was similar to that of healthy full-term infants; the former had deficits in visual electrophysiologic maturation, especially for very low birth weight children [ 26 ]. Feng et al noticed that latency of the P2 main wave on FVEPs was delayed more significantly in premature infants than in full-term infants [ 27 ]. They ascertained that the visual functional development was delayed in preterm born infants, especially in infants with very low birth weight and in gestational age less than 32 weeks [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al noticed that latency of the P2 main wave on FVEPs was delayed more significantly in premature infants than in full-term infants [ 27 ]. They ascertained that the visual functional development was delayed in preterm born infants, especially in infants with very low birth weight and in gestational age less than 32 weeks [ 27 , 28 ]. However, FVEP is less precise examination than PVEP; thereby PVEP should be the first ordered testing [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] More recently, the clinical utility of VEP in premature neonates has been confirmed by Feng et al . [1415] It is known that the result of VEP depends on retinal development, optic nerve myelination, lateral geniculate nucleus maturation, and occipital cortex development, but there are still some controversies about the influence of ROP on VEP examination results in preterm children. [1617]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, our results seem to suggest that P2 component is associated with visual stimuli threshold discrimination, and N3 component is more likely to be associated with complex interactive abilities. Specifically, P2 has been associated with processing the physical properties of stimuli while N3 with attentional behaviors underlying interactive conditions (Feng et al, 2010; McCulloch and de Haan, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%