2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame behaviors and pressure characteristics of vented dust explosions at elevated static activation overpressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vented external flames of gases (Daubech et al, 2013;Rocourt et al, 2014;Molkov et al, 2006) and dusts (Castellanos et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2015) have been experimentally and numerically investigated. In current experiments, external flames can hardly be observed for  = 0.4 and 0.6 owing to low flame luminosity, and typical flame images of the external flames recorded by a high-speed camera are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Propagation Of External Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vented external flames of gases (Daubech et al, 2013;Rocourt et al, 2014;Molkov et al, 2006) and dusts (Castellanos et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2015) have been experimentally and numerically investigated. In current experiments, external flames can hardly be observed for  = 0.4 and 0.6 owing to low flame luminosity, and typical flame images of the external flames recorded by a high-speed camera are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Propagation Of External Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing research works have not paid enough attention to the explosion flame propagation characteristics under pressure accumulation, which makes it impossible to accurately and comprehensively describe the flame propagation mechanism(s) in the real explosion process. Various studies have shown that explosion pressure significantly affects the flame propagation behavior, such as flame thickness and propagation velocity, thereby affecting the flame propagation mechanism(s) [27][28][29][30]. In addition, due to the confinement of the closed space wall, the product of the high temperature and high pressure produced by the explosion process cannot be released in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the conventional ductless explosion venting method, many studies have been performed to investigate how the internal pressure of the vessel is affected by different explosion venting parameters such as the ignition positions (Eckhoff et al, 1988), vent diameter (Tascón et al, 2016 andGao et al, 2015), and opening pressure Aguado, 2017 andGao et al, 2016). Yan et al (2015) performed a dust explosion experiment in a 20 L spherical explosion test device and analyzed the effects of the vent diameter and opening pressure on the occurrence of a secondary explosion. The results of their study showed that a secondary explosion likely occurs when the area of the explosion vent port is larger and the opening pressure of the explosion vent is smaller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%