2009
DOI: 10.1177/1357034x08100147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

`Flagging' the Skin: Corporeal Nationalism and the Properties of Belonging

Abstract: Just as the nation is imagined and produced through everyday rhetoric and maps and flags, it is also constructed on the skin, and through bodies, by different types of corporeal `flagging'. In this article, I use two examples of contemporary surgical procedures to explore these dynamics. Aesthetic surgeries on `white' subjects are not often interrogated for their racializing effects, but I use the concept of `flagging' to explore how these surgeries work in the UK to align `white' bodies with a white nation. U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, the focus on the corporeal dimension of nationalism (Grabham, ) privileges a particular feature, the face, as somatic traits were often mentioned by participants in their “troubled” national encounters. Does the nation have a face?…”
Section: Banal and Everyday Nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the focus on the corporeal dimension of nationalism (Grabham, ) privileges a particular feature, the face, as somatic traits were often mentioned by participants in their “troubled” national encounters. Does the nation have a face?…”
Section: Banal and Everyday Nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, alongside state sight are practices which allow publics and populations, in turn, to see (and thereby help to consolidate) the nation-state. This visual production of nation-statehood has generated a vibrant series of writings examining metonymic practical displays, from landscaping, memorials, statues, and flags to body surgery and national commemorative festivals (see Billig 1995;Roy 2006;Grabham 2009a).…”
Section: Thinking About Touchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Approaching beliefs, today, as things that can also be "held" and possessed similarly reveals the extending power of property discourse, as religious, ontological and moral beliefs get constituted as the legally recognised social property of individual and group subjects within the neo/ liberal north (Cooper and Herman, 2013). The concept of beliefs as property does not mean beliefs are market-alienable, any more than other social properties such as whiteness (Harris, 1993;Grabham, 2009;Keenan, 2010).…”
Section: Possessive Beliefs and Playmentioning
confidence: 99%