2019
DOI: 10.3390/machines7040068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixture Optimization in Turning Thin-Wall Components

Abstract: The turning of thin-walled components is a challenging process due to the flexibility of the parts. On one hand, static deflection due to the cutting forces causes geometrical and dimensional errors, while unstable vibration (i.e., chatter) could compromise surface quality. In this work, a method for fixturing optimization for thin-walled components in turning is proposed. Starting from workpiece geometry and toolpath, workpiece deflections and system dynamics are predicted by means of an efficient finite elem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome these difficulties, they applied single pressure chains that generate a pressure stress of 800 KPa or more under a moderate magnetic field. Croppi et al [34] presented a general methodology for the optimization of reinforcement in cases of turning thin-wall workpieces. Starting from the geometry of the workpiece and the tool path, by combining the FE model, the geometric error model, and the fixture model, the optimal configuration of the fixture is calculated as the one that can guarantee the imposed tolerance and stable machining with a minimum number of additional supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties, they applied single pressure chains that generate a pressure stress of 800 KPa or more under a moderate magnetic field. Croppi et al [34] presented a general methodology for the optimization of reinforcement in cases of turning thin-wall workpieces. Starting from the geometry of the workpiece and the tool path, by combining the FE model, the geometric error model, and the fixture model, the optimal configuration of the fixture is calculated as the one that can guarantee the imposed tolerance and stable machining with a minimum number of additional supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consuming time for clamping the complex cabins is longer than its processing time, and the utilization rate of most machining equipment is less than 30%. It can be seen that the clamping tooling is an important part to affect the machining accuracy and the benchmark transmission, which directly influences product quality, production efficiency, and processing cost [6,7]. According to a study by the Boeing Company on machining deformation of four aircraft projects, the economic losses of parts rework and scrap due to machining deformation exceeded 290 million USD [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful machining requires the use of one of the techniques to avoid chatter [30]. In practice, this is usually addressed either by reducing the dynamic compliance of the workpiece by additional reinforcement [12], damping with active or passive dampers, or by appropriate intervention in the force action of the process -either by disrupting the regenerative principle or by reducing the magnitude of the force response. In case of disturbance of the regenerative principle, either the use of gaps between lobes in high-speed machining (especially in milling [24]), speed variation in low-speed machining [16,20,2] or one of the newer methods such as regenerative compensation by active control [23], machining with ultrasonic vibration [33] or the method of time-varying longitudinal workpiece stiffness due to external force [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%