“…Of recent FinTech studies, some focus on all aspects of the issue in general (e.g., Arner et al 2016;Zalan and Toufaily 2017;Dospinescu et al 2021), while others examine morespecific aspects. These include studies related to banks and traditional financial institutions (Kotarba 2016;Buchak et al 2018;Hu et al 2019), venture capital, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain (Kaplan and Lerner 2016;Ante et al 2018;Gozman and Willcocks 2019;Kim et al 2018;Ji and Tia 2021;Mora et al 2021), insurance (Yan et al 2018b;Stoeckli et al 2018), and asset management (Rogowski 2017;Dugast and Foucault 2018). While each study adds an important perspective on the subject, a bibliometric analysis can provide a broader perspective and assessment than has been the case for studies thus far.…”
The financial-technology industry has recently attracted the attention of many sectors. The financial-technology industry designs new and unusual technological financial services in many areas. It combines technology with finance and provides an alternative to the traditional financial system. In the scope of this study, 636 publications were obtained from Scopus. Various tools, such as Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis, and VOSviewer for data visualization, were used. The open-source codes used for bibliometric analysis through the R Studio program were developed by the authors and used for citation-metrics analysis. The main aim of this study was to find out the most influential studies and authors and to reveal the distributions and impacts of publications in the FinTech area between 2015 and 2021 from the Scopus database. The results indicate that the most influential journal is Sustainability Switzerland, and the most cited author is Gomber et al. Additionally, Rabbani has the most publications, while China has emerged as the most productive country. On the other hand, this study found that FinTech research clustered in four areas. These areas are computer science, business management, economics, and social sciences. This FinTech study examines financial services, financial access, and financial technology, where FinTech is at the center. It also focuses on cryptocurrency, bitcoin, and smart contracts where the blockchain is at the center. The results reveal a systematic map of existing studies. Further, the study plays a guiding role in future research.
“…Of recent FinTech studies, some focus on all aspects of the issue in general (e.g., Arner et al 2016;Zalan and Toufaily 2017;Dospinescu et al 2021), while others examine morespecific aspects. These include studies related to banks and traditional financial institutions (Kotarba 2016;Buchak et al 2018;Hu et al 2019), venture capital, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain (Kaplan and Lerner 2016;Ante et al 2018;Gozman and Willcocks 2019;Kim et al 2018;Ji and Tia 2021;Mora et al 2021), insurance (Yan et al 2018b;Stoeckli et al 2018), and asset management (Rogowski 2017;Dugast and Foucault 2018). While each study adds an important perspective on the subject, a bibliometric analysis can provide a broader perspective and assessment than has been the case for studies thus far.…”
The financial-technology industry has recently attracted the attention of many sectors. The financial-technology industry designs new and unusual technological financial services in many areas. It combines technology with finance and provides an alternative to the traditional financial system. In the scope of this study, 636 publications were obtained from Scopus. Various tools, such as Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis, and VOSviewer for data visualization, were used. The open-source codes used for bibliometric analysis through the R Studio program were developed by the authors and used for citation-metrics analysis. The main aim of this study was to find out the most influential studies and authors and to reveal the distributions and impacts of publications in the FinTech area between 2015 and 2021 from the Scopus database. The results indicate that the most influential journal is Sustainability Switzerland, and the most cited author is Gomber et al. Additionally, Rabbani has the most publications, while China has emerged as the most productive country. On the other hand, this study found that FinTech research clustered in four areas. These areas are computer science, business management, economics, and social sciences. This FinTech study examines financial services, financial access, and financial technology, where FinTech is at the center. It also focuses on cryptocurrency, bitcoin, and smart contracts where the blockchain is at the center. The results reveal a systematic map of existing studies. Further, the study plays a guiding role in future research.
“…This research adopts bibliometrics analysis to present the development of zakat literature. The bibliometric analysis enables the researcher to investigate the current performance of the previous study based on quantitative and qualitative approaches (Yan et al, 2018). Furthermore, (Zupic & Čater, 2015) declares that bibliometric analysis provides the research result regarding the most impactful institutions, countries, journals, authors and articles and clusters the most discussed topic without subjective bias.…”
This research is intended to provide a comprehensive historical and present development of zakat literature through bibliometrics analysis extracted from Scopus database. From 522 articles related to zakat, the findings show that Universiti Utara Malaysia, IMEFM, and Saad, R. A. J have become the most institution, journal and author that published in zakah literature respectively. Moreover, the article from Haniffa, R; Hudaib (2007) is found to be the most cited article worldwide. While Malaysia has become the hub center of the research collaboration network with a strong collaboration with Indonesian researchers.
“…In the identification stage, a search for relevant papers that had been published in the last five years at least (January 2016 to September 2020) was carried out by us, taking into account the WoS and Scopus databases. WoS for allowing access to more than 12,000 journals (Costa et al, 2017) and being considered an authority in the scientific literature (Yan, Liao & Chen, 2018) and Scopus for being the largest bibliometric database (Filser. Silva & Oliveira, 2017;Silva & Oliveira, 2017), both considered as the most relevant standard citation bases (Cisneros et al, 2018;Mongeon & Paul-Hus, 2016;Tunger & Eulerich, 2018).…”
The economy, culture, and social development of countries in the 21st century are directly related to the quality of education. For education to have expected quality and deliver the desired values to their client, many educational institutions are applying Lean management. Therefore, the paper aimed to explore the Lean implementation in education through a systematic review of papers from the past five years, in English and the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodology was developed using the PRISMA protocol and has been according to the type of approach, place of analysis, tools, facilitators, barriers, positive results, negative results, and the tendency of future work. The main results found were that 69.57% of the papers are analytical, LSS is the most discussed tool, the reduction is the main facilitator, the lack of Lean knowledge is the main barrier, and the attendance to the student obtained the best positive result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.