The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2800-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-income securities: bibliometric review with network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of recent FinTech studies, some focus on all aspects of the issue in general (e.g., Arner et al 2016;Zalan and Toufaily 2017;Dospinescu et al 2021), while others examine morespecific aspects. These include studies related to banks and traditional financial institutions (Kotarba 2016;Buchak et al 2018;Hu et al 2019), venture capital, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain (Kaplan and Lerner 2016;Ante et al 2018;Gozman and Willcocks 2019;Kim et al 2018;Ji and Tia 2021;Mora et al 2021), insurance (Yan et al 2018b;Stoeckli et al 2018), and asset management (Rogowski 2017;Dugast and Foucault 2018). While each study adds an important perspective on the subject, a bibliometric analysis can provide a broader perspective and assessment than has been the case for studies thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of recent FinTech studies, some focus on all aspects of the issue in general (e.g., Arner et al 2016;Zalan and Toufaily 2017;Dospinescu et al 2021), while others examine morespecific aspects. These include studies related to banks and traditional financial institutions (Kotarba 2016;Buchak et al 2018;Hu et al 2019), venture capital, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain (Kaplan and Lerner 2016;Ante et al 2018;Gozman and Willcocks 2019;Kim et al 2018;Ji and Tia 2021;Mora et al 2021), insurance (Yan et al 2018b;Stoeckli et al 2018), and asset management (Rogowski 2017;Dugast and Foucault 2018). While each study adds an important perspective on the subject, a bibliometric analysis can provide a broader perspective and assessment than has been the case for studies thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research adopts bibliometrics analysis to present the development of zakat literature. The bibliometric analysis enables the researcher to investigate the current performance of the previous study based on quantitative and qualitative approaches (Yan et al, 2018). Furthermore, (Zupic & Čater, 2015) declares that bibliometric analysis provides the research result regarding the most impactful institutions, countries, journals, authors and articles and clusters the most discussed topic without subjective bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the identification stage, a search for relevant papers that had been published in the last five years at least (January 2016 to September 2020) was carried out by us, taking into account the WoS and Scopus databases. WoS for allowing access to more than 12,000 journals (Costa et al, 2017) and being considered an authority in the scientific literature (Yan, Liao & Chen, 2018) and Scopus for being the largest bibliometric database (Filser. Silva & Oliveira, 2017;Silva & Oliveira, 2017), both considered as the most relevant standard citation bases (Cisneros et al, 2018;Mongeon & Paul-Hus, 2016;Tunger & Eulerich, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%