2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
205
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
8
205
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of OLS, we therefore use the Hausman & Taylor (1981) estimator which takes into account the panel structure of the data. Our model selection process follows Baltagi, Bresson, and Pirotte (2003) in using the Hausman (1978) test to select between alternative panel data estimators. First, we perform a Hausman test comparing the fixed and random effects estimators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of OLS, we therefore use the Hausman & Taylor (1981) estimator which takes into account the panel structure of the data. Our model selection process follows Baltagi, Bresson, and Pirotte (2003) in using the Hausman (1978) test to select between alternative panel data estimators. First, we perform a Hausman test comparing the fixed and random effects estimators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baltagi, Bresson and Pirotte (2003) emphasized that most applications in economics since the 1980s have made the choice between the RE and FE estimators based upon the standard Hausman test. The authors suggest that if this standard Hausman test rejects the null hypothesis that the conditional mean of the disturbances given the regressors is zero, the applied researcher reports the FE estimator, otherwise, the researcher reports the RE estimator.…”
Section: Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, a treatment of the individual effects has to be incorporated into the model in order to capture county-specific heterogeneity that may bias the coefficient estimates. Either fixed effects or random effects can be incorporated to account for spatial heterogeneities and stable unobservable characteristics associated with individual counties [45,46]. Assuming that the random error term in Equation (1) has two separate components, the resulting model can be specified as…”
Section: Empirical Models and Variable Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%