2012
DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0b013e328358da2d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-year follow-up of 16 melanoma patients with a Starz I-involved sentinel node in whom completion lymph node dissection was omitted

Abstract: The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of lymph node recurrence in 16 melanoma patients with a minimal metastasis (Starz level I) in a sentinel node in whom a completion lymph node dissection was omitted. A secondary aim was to examine whether other melanoma-related recurrences developed. Sixteen melanoma patients with an SI-involved sentinel node, who did not undergo completion lymph node dissection, were followed for a median of 66 months. Lymph node recurrences did not occur. One of the 16 pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that we recorded three dead patients among the S1 subgroup in absence of NSLN involvement, our future study will aim to select important biomarkers that, in combination with S-classification, could help to select a S1 subgroup presenting major risk of disease progression. Interestingly, while this research was in progress, Veenstra et al, reported a positive 5-years experience for 16 melanoma patients classified as Starz level 1 that did not undergo completion lymphatic node dissection [33]. Although further investigations are needed, on larger and multicentric studies, we think that our observations can contribute to suggest the way to find a clinically reliable technique (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that we recorded three dead patients among the S1 subgroup in absence of NSLN involvement, our future study will aim to select important biomarkers that, in combination with S-classification, could help to select a S1 subgroup presenting major risk of disease progression. Interestingly, while this research was in progress, Veenstra et al, reported a positive 5-years experience for 16 melanoma patients classified as Starz level 1 that did not undergo completion lymphatic node dissection [33]. Although further investigations are needed, on larger and multicentric studies, we think that our observations can contribute to suggest the way to find a clinically reliable technique (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On these bases some Authors suggested the possibility to avoid the CLND to a subgroup of selected patients [30-34]. Already in few centres, patients with SLN tumour deposits <0.1mm in maximal dimension can choose if undergo CLND or clinical nodal follow-up [16,18,33-38]. In our report, using univariate analysis, we confirmed the prognostic relevance of Starz classification suggesting that patients classified as S1 could safely spare to the CLND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%