Five-Factor Model Personality Traits and Self-Classified Religiousness and Spirituality

Lace, John W.; Evans, Luke; Merz, Zachary C.; Handal, Paul J.

doi:10.1007/s10943-019-00847-1

Cited by 23 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This was indicated by the separation of the contrasting factor loadings from the constructs of the Big Five. This may have been caused by the virtues construct of the anchor theory accommodating individual spiritual values in the Big Five, so that, in the future, measurement of spirituality in the Big Five should use a different measurement instrument, as was done by Saroglou and Munoz-Garcia (2008), as well as Lace et al, (2020). This generally occurs with mainstream psychological research, which often does not consider the spiritual dimension of mankind important, because of the presumption that spirituality is something which cannot be seen nor be measured (Bhat, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hal ini ditunjukkan oleh pemisahan factor loading yang kontras dengan konstrukkonstruk Big Five. Hal tersebut dapat disebabkan karena anchor virtues mengakomodasi nilai spiritualitas individu, yang tidak diakomodasi dalam Big Five, sehingga kemudian pengukuran terhadap kepribadian Big Five dengan spiritualitas harus menggunakan alat ukur yang berbeda, seperti yang dilakukan oleh Saroglou dan Munoz-Garcia (2008), serta Lace et al, (2020). Hal ini umum terjadi pada penelitian psikologi mainstream yang seringkali tidak menganggap penting dimensi spiritual pada manusia karena beranggapan bahwa spiritualitas merupakan sesuatu yang tidak dapat dilihat dan diukur (Bhat, 2016).…”

Section: Diskusiunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Study of the Internal Structure of the Anchor Personality Inventory [Kajian Struktur Internal dari Anchor Personality Inventory]

Riyono

2020

ANIMA IPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Anchor Personality Inventory (API) is based on the Anchor personality theory. The objective of this study is to perform a comparative analysis between the internal structures of API and Big Five Personality. The data was collected from 333 students from a university of various faculties. The data analysis to examine the structure of API was an exploratory factor analysis. The result of the study shows that the API constructs fall into different factors, separated from the Big Five Personality constructs. Virtues is the strongest construct of API, followed by material, self, and others. Anchor Personality Inventory (API) merupakan konstruksi alat ukur kepribadian menurut teori kepribadian anchor. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan struktur internal konstruk dari API dengan konstruk kepribadian berdasarkan teori Big Five Personality. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 333 mahasiswa satu perguruan tinggi dari berbagai fakultas. Teknik analisis data untuk menguji struktur dari konstruk penyusun API adalah analisis faktor eksploratori. Hasil analisis faktor menunjukkan bahwa keempat konstruksi anchor memiliki loading factor yang terpisah dari lima konstruksi kepribadian Big Five Personality. Virtues adalah konstruksi terkuat di antara empat anchor, diikuti oleh materi, self, dan others.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Diskusiunclassified

A Study of the Internal Structure of the Anchor Personality Inventory [Kajian Struktur Internal dari Anchor Personality Inventory]

Riyono

2020

ANIMA IPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…R. McCrae et al, 2002). Lace et al (2020) argue that this distinction between genders in personality traits stems from female having more religious and spiritual values.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of problematic internet use behaviors of athletes in terms of personality traits

Bedir

Erhan

2021

Cogent Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of study is to reveal the relationship between the personality traits of athletes and problematic internet use (PIU), and in this way, to reveal which personality traits athletes tend to PIU. A total of 428 athletes, 204 (47.7%) males and 224 (52.3%) females, who were engaged in amateur and professional level sports in various sports clubs, participated in the study. "Internet Addiction Scale" was used to determine the PIU status of the participants and "Five Factor Model of Personality Scale" was used to determine the personality characteristics. The stepwise regression method was used to determine the level of predicting PIU of personality traits. As a result of the analyzes, it was determined to what extent the variables of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness, and gender predicted PIU and as a result of this process, R = .798, R 2 = .637. As a result, it was seen that 63.7% of the total variance in the PIU of the athletes was explained by the personality traits.

show abstract

“…Almost 50% of the variance in divergent thinking could be accounted by the NEO-FFI factors, while intelligence measured by Wonderlic Personnel Test provided no incremental variance in creativity scores [6]. Interesting is the studies [7,8] is that the personality traits of treatment-seeking problem gamblers have been compared to healthy control groups in several studies and, although there is consistent evidence for high Neuroticism and low Conscientiousness in problem gamblers, past results may have been affected by selection bias. This study replicated these findings in a correlational design.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Big Five in University Students in Relation to Psychological and Entrepreneurial Competences

Kmecová

Kajanová

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the research was to find and analyse the dependence factors of the individual personality. For the purpose of the analysis, students of two higher education institutions in the South Bohemian Region, the Czech Republic, were chosen. The students were from different fields of study, men and women, of different age. The research further dealt with the dependency of the Big Five factors on the positive and negative stress management strategies. The research results can be used for further studies that would be a contribution to theory as well as for the individualization of the approach to concrete groups or individual students.

show abstract

Five-Factor Model Personality Traits and Self-Classified Religiousness and Spirituality

Cited by 23 publications

References 78 publications

A Study of the Internal Structure of the Anchor Personality Inventory [Kajian Struktur Internal dari Anchor Personality Inventory]

A Study of the Internal Structure of the Anchor Personality Inventory [Kajian Struktur Internal dari Anchor Personality Inventory]

Investigation of problematic internet use behaviors of athletes in terms of personality traits

Big Five in University Students in Relation to Psychological and Entrepreneurial Competences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About