1994
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-component model of schizophrenia: Assessing the factorial invariance of the positive and negative syndrome scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
214
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
214
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This will likely facilitate the comparability of our results with those obtained in future studies. The symptom dimensions were founded on the PANSS which has previously been shown to be resilient to the effects of age, severity of symptoms, chronicity of illness (White et al 1997) and short-term medication withdrawal (Lindenmayer et al 1994).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will likely facilitate the comparability of our results with those obtained in future studies. The symptom dimensions were founded on the PANSS which has previously been shown to be resilient to the effects of age, severity of symptoms, chronicity of illness (White et al 1997) and short-term medication withdrawal (Lindenmayer et al 1994).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research conducted in firstepisode psychosis (FEP) cases where symptomatology is not affected by differences in clinical practice, hospitalisation and treatment choices is still lacking (Emsley et al 2003;Demjaha et al 2009). Existing research has most frequently identified multidimensional models with five factors (Bell et al 1994;Lindenmayer et al 1994;White et al 1997;Lancon et al 1998;Emsley et al 2003). Based on previous work, Wallwork et al (2012) derived a consensus five-factor model of psychosis that comprised positive (e.g., delusions, hallucinatory behaviour), negative (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal), disorganised/concrete (e.g., conceptual disorganisation, difficulty in abstract thinking), excited (e.g., excitement, hostility) and depressed (e.g., depression, guilt feelings) dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS (Kay et al, 1989)) was employed to assess several dimensions of behavior. In this report, empirically derived factors are reported excluding those items that could not be assessed during the test sessions (Bell et al, 1994): positive symptom factor (delusions, unusual thoughts, somatic concern, grandiosity, suspiciousness, and hallucinations), negative symptom factor (emotional withdrawal, blunted affect, poor rapport, disturbance of volition, preoccupation, and motor retardation), cognitive factor (difficulty in abstract thinking, stereotyped thinking, cognitive disorganization, lack of judgement and insight, poor attention, tension, mannerisms, and posturing), hostility (excitement, hostility, impulse control, and uncooperativeness), emotional discomfort (depression, anxiety, and guilt). In addition, subjects completed visual analog scales (VAS) measuring high, drowsiness, nervousness, and the number of standard alcohol drinks that would be anticipated to produce the subjective effects experienced at a given timepoint (the 'number of drinks' scale) (Krystal et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptom ratings were categorized into a five-factor structure (i.e., positive, negative, cognitive, hostility, and emotional discomfort) that has been suggested to provide a more sensitive subtype classification than the conventional Positive, Negative, and General subscale distribution (Bell et al, 1994a(Bell et al, , 1994bKay & Sevy, 1990).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%