2015
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201520130514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting mathematical models to lactation curves from holstein cows in the southwestern region of the state of Parana, Brazil

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate four mathematical models with regards to their fit to lactation curves of Holstein cows from herds raised in the southwestern region of the state of Parana, Brazil. Initially, 42,281 milk production records from 2005 to 2011 were obtained from "Associação Paranaense de Criadores de Bovinos da Raça Holandesa (APCBRH)". Data lacking dates of drying and total milk production at 305 days of lactation were excluded, resulting in a remaining 15,142 records corresponding to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best fit due to gamma-type function model was reported by Boujenane [ 14 ] in Moroccan Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and Jingar et al [ 12 ] in Karan Fries (crossbred) cows. The superiority in variability explained by gamma-type function in multiparous (second or more lactations) cows was in agreement with findings of previous studies [ 18 , 19 ] but contrast with reports of Koçak and Ekiz [ 20 ] in Holstein cows and Dohare et al [ 21 ] in Frieswal cows (62% Friesian and 38% Sahiwal inheritance). However, lowest adjusted R 2 value and highest values of RMSE, AIC and BIC were observed for quadratic model fitting, which in accordance with reports of Cilek and Keskin [ 22 ] who fitted gamma-type function, mixed log, quadratic model, cubic and exponential and polynomial regression model to lactation curve of Simmental cows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The best fit due to gamma-type function model was reported by Boujenane [ 14 ] in Moroccan Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and Jingar et al [ 12 ] in Karan Fries (crossbred) cows. The superiority in variability explained by gamma-type function in multiparous (second or more lactations) cows was in agreement with findings of previous studies [ 18 , 19 ] but contrast with reports of Koçak and Ekiz [ 20 ] in Holstein cows and Dohare et al [ 21 ] in Frieswal cows (62% Friesian and 38% Sahiwal inheritance). However, lowest adjusted R 2 value and highest values of RMSE, AIC and BIC were observed for quadratic model fitting, which in accordance with reports of Cilek and Keskin [ 22 ] who fitted gamma-type function, mixed log, quadratic model, cubic and exponential and polynomial regression model to lactation curve of Simmental cows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They concluded that the Wood model was close to the actual data in predicting peak yield and peak time. Also, Ferreira et al [1] showed that the Wood model compared to the Brody as well as the Dijkstra and Pollott models had the best fit (also according to AIC and R 2 values). Karangelil et al [3] analysed lactation curves in Chios sheep milked with an AMS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMS provides data daily while test-day milkings record milk and milking parameters once a month. The literature shows that curves constructed based on test-day data are often modelled with the use of the following functions: Wilmink, Wood, Ali-Schaeffer, Brody, Pollott, Dijkstra, Legendre polynomials [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Ordinarily, in dairy production milkings, recording systems are based on test-day records [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, we can list some models that fitted lactation profiles adequately (Ferreira et al, 2015), i.e., the models proposed by Brody et al (1924), Wood (1967), and Dijkstra et al (1997), and we suggest the Gamma probability density function as a generalized form of Wood's model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%