2015
DOI: 10.1364/oe.23.022404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting discrete aspherical surface sag data using orthonormal polynomials

Abstract: Characterizing real-life optical surfaces usually involves finding the best-fit of an appropriate surface model to a set of discrete measurement data. This process can be greatly simplified by choosing orthonormal polynomials for the surface description. In case of rotationally symmetric aspherical surfaces, new sets of orthogonal polynomials were introduced by Forbes to replace the numerical unstable standard description. From these, for the application of surface retrieval using experimental ray tracing, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for a freeform surface with a complex aperture shape, the corresponding analytical orthogonal polynomial is usually difficult to obtain. Malacara et al, 66 Dai and Mahajan, 67 Ye et al, 49 and Hilbig et al 72 have presented different methods to overcome this issue.…”
Section: Other Representation Techniques For Handling Discrete Data Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for a freeform surface with a complex aperture shape, the corresponding analytical orthogonal polynomial is usually difficult to obtain. Malacara et al, 66 Dai and Mahajan, 67 Ye et al, 49 and Hilbig et al 72 have presented different methods to overcome this issue.…”
Section: Other Representation Techniques For Handling Discrete Data Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the problem, the Gram-Schmidt process was used to generate mutually orthogonal polynomials in the unit circle. 6,7 The Gauss-Newton algorithm was used to solve nonlinear least squares problems through iterations to reduce fitting errors. This method was reported to be able to further improve fitting precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%