1998
DOI: 10.1109/4235.735432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness sharing and niching methods revisited

Abstract: Abstract-Interest in multimodal optimization function is expanding rapidly since real-world optimization problems often require the location of multiple optima in the search space. In this context, fitness sharing has been used widely to maintain population diversity and permit the investigation of many peaks in the feasible domain. This paper reviews various strategies of sharing and proposes new recombination schemes to improve its efficiency. Some empirical results are presented for high and a limited numbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
256
0
15

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 481 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
256
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Further exploration is afforded by diversity enhancing operators, such as niching (Sareni and Krähenbühl (1998), Epitropakis et al (2011)). This is particularly popular in multi-objective optimization, where good coverage of the Pareto front is needed (Horn et al (1994)).…”
Section: Nature-inspired Algorithms Such As Ga and Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further exploration is afforded by diversity enhancing operators, such as niching (Sareni and Krähenbühl (1998), Epitropakis et al (2011)). This is particularly popular in multi-objective optimization, where good coverage of the Pareto front is needed (Horn et al (1994)).…”
Section: Nature-inspired Algorithms Such As Ga and Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the most popular version of fitness sharing (Sareni and Krähenbühl, 1998), with parameter α = 1 and different niche radius ρ. The niche radius was chosen relative to mutation range σ: ρ = (1, 5, 10) · σ.…”
Section: Impatience Vs Fitness Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A population trapped at the optimum usually has limited diversity and limited ability to find another, possibly better, optimum. Many strategies of regaining population diversity have been proposed: crowding (DeJong, 1975;Mengshoel and Goldberg, 2008;Kowalczuk and Białaszewski, 2006), fitness sharing (Goldberg and Richardson, 1987;Sareni and Krähenbühl, 1998) and spatially structured populations (Tomassini, 2005;Dick and Whigham, 2006) are the most popular. In order to preserve diversity, hybrid methods combine different optimization strategies at various stages of the search process (Grosan and Abraham, 2007;Barabasz et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of stochastic optimization methods such as EAs is recommended. In this study, we compare the standard anisotropic evolution strategy (ES) [4] with two niching EAs [5]: the clearing algorithm (CL) [6] and the restricted tournament selection (RTS) with self-adaptive recombination [7,8]. Moreover, two different chromosome encoding strategies have been implemented for generating signal profiles ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Signal Synthesis Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%